[undertow-dev] Another questions based on UNDERTOW-349, what was wrong

[Stuart Douglas]

If there was a max queue size and the queue was full the request would
be rejected.

Stuart

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:07 PM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja at gmail.com> wrote:
> how the request was rejected ? by which criteria or event ?
>
> On Jan 12, 2017 03:13, "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> The exchange completion listener was added two early. If a request was
>> rejected then this would cause the count to go negative (as the count
>> would be decreased without ever having been increased).
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:12 AM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'd like to have understanding of what was going on with
>> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-349, in which under some
>> > circumstance the io.undertow.server.handlers.RequestLimit got corrupted
>> > and
>> > could not process Queue correctly,
>> >
>> > probably someone could kindly explain me more ?
>> >
>> > btw. after digest below mailing list, I still could not figure out what
>> > was
>> > wrong with RequestLimit (
>> > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2014-December/001049.html
>> > )
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > undertow-dev mailing list
>> > undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev