[undertow-dev] Another questions based on UNDERTOW-349, what was wrong

[tone randomnaja]

Oh, I through that failureHandle would also get the Exchange completed, and
listenner be called ?

On Jan 12, 2017 11:23, "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas at redhat.com> wrote:

> If there was a max queue size and the queue was full the request would
> be rejected.
>
> Stuart
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:07 PM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > how the request was rejected ? by which criteria or event ?
> >
> > On Jan 12, 2017 03:13, "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The exchange completion listener was added two early. If a request was
> >> rejected then this would cause the count to go negative (as the count
> >> would be decreased without ever having been increased).
> >>
> >> Stuart
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:12 AM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to have understanding of what was going on with
> >> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-349, in which under some
> >> > circumstance the io.undertow.server.handlers.RequestLimit got
> corrupted
> >> > and
> >> > could not process Queue correctly,
> >> >
> >> > probably someone could kindly explain me more ?
> >> >
> >> > btw. after digest below mailing list, I still could not figure out
> what
> >> > was
> >> > wrong with RequestLimit (
> >> > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2014-
> December/001049.html
> >> > )
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > undertow-dev mailing list
> >> > undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/attachments/20170112/ab68fa35/attachment.html