[undertow-dev] Undertow 3 API Migration

[Darran Lofthouse]

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:42 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> This is a good idea. If you see areas where this can be done can you file
> a JIRA (or better yet open a PR)?
>

Will start to get some PRs in - I think the executors are the hardest
change but will start with these as I find them.


> In this case I think we should get rid of the Netty one entirely, and just
> have an agnostic one.
>

+1 I think once we have agnostic alternatives remove the Netty specifics
from Undertow 3.


> Maybe we also need an Undertow 2.1 branch, which will aim to improve
> compatibility by adding methods like this that will work in both versions.
>

What is the policy regarding adding new API in 2.0 if this approach needs a
minor version increment may be useful to get something started.


>
> Stuart
>
>
>>
>> I suspect a number of the other changes breaking API compatibility could
>> be handled in a similar way.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> undertow-dev mailing list
>> undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/attachments/20190416/77ecd105/attachment.html