[undertow-dev] Undertow 3 API Migration

[Stuart Douglas]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:49 PM Darran Lofthouse <darran.lofthouse at jboss.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:42 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> This is a good idea. If you see areas where this can be done can you file
>> a JIRA (or better yet open a PR)?
>>
>
> Will start to get some PRs in - I think the executors are the hardest
> change but will start with these as I find them.
>
>
>> In this case I think we should get rid of the Netty one entirely, and
>> just have an agnostic one.
>>
>
> +1 I think once we have agnostic alternatives remove the Netty specifics
> from Undertow 3.
>
>
>> Maybe we also need an Undertow 2.1 branch, which will aim to improve
>> compatibility by adding methods like this that will work in both versions.
>>
>
> What is the policy regarding adding new API in 2.0 if this approach needs
> a minor version increment may be useful to get something started.
>

We have added new methods in micros before, but if we are doing a big chunk
of them we should target 2.1.

Stuart


>
>
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I suspect a number of the other changes breaking API compatibility could
>>> be handled in a similar way.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> undertow-dev mailing list
>>> undertow-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/attachments/20190416/d7e89c19/attachment.html