[webbeans-dev] binding Manager to JNDI on Jetty

[Pete Muir]

On 23 Apr 2009, at 20:03, Dan Allen wrote:

> Aha! After some thinking, I realized that using a factory in Jetty  
> is just a matter of some extra object construction. Instead of  
> passing the ManagerObjectFactory directly, you simply pass a naming  
> Reference that refers to the factory.
>
>    <New id="jdciManager"  
> class="org.mortbay.jetty.plus.naming.Resource">
>       <Arg><Ref id="webAppCtx"/></Arg>
>       <Arg>jcdi/Manager</Arg>
>       <Arg>
>          <New class="javax.naming.Reference">
>             <Arg>javax.inject.manager.Manager</Arg>
>             <Arg>org.jboss.webbeans.resources.ManagerObjectFactory</ 
> Arg>
>             <Arg/>
>          </New>
>       </Arg>
>    </New>

This seems fine to me - I think adding another class is just more  
options.

>
>
> That works out of the box now. So the question becomes, should we  
> add the class to simplify it to:
>
>    <New id="jdci" class="org.mortbay.jetty.plus.naming.Resource">
>       <Arg><Ref id="webAppCtx"/></Arg>
>       <Arg>jcdi/Manager</Arg>
>       <Arg>
>          <New  
> class="org.jboss.webbeans.resources.ManagerObjectFactoryReference"/>
>       </Arg>
>    </New>
>
> ?
>
> I guess it can't hurt to add the class, but with proper  
> documentation we can live without it. Pete, once you make the  
> decision, I'll add it to the docs (and commit if you decide to have  
> the extra class).
>
> Notice I went with the name ManagerObjectFactoryReference, which  
> reads the best to me.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> Yeah, looks like Jetty doesn't support ObjectFactory natively.  
> Probably it is actually neater to keep these two concepts separate,  
> and just add an ManagerObjectFactoryReference class.
>
>
> On 23 Apr 2009, at 00:53, Dan Allen wrote:
>
> In the process of setting up the servlet-booking example for Seam, I  
> tackled the problem of binding the JCDI Manager to JNDI on Jetty.  
> It's just a matter of extending the javax.naming.Reference class. I  
> attached the implementation to https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WBX-31 
> .
>
> Should I commit this Pete? I need a decison on whether we should  
> change the name of the class to reflect that it is an ObjectFactory  
> and a Reference. I think internally Tomcat must create the reference  
> automatically from the resource definition, which is why Jetty  
> doesn't know what to do with a plain ObjectFactory.
>
> ...I also noticed that injection is not supported in Jetty. I'm not  
> sure how to handle that problem, but it means no booking yet on Jetty.
>
> -Dan
>
> -- 
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
>
> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than  
> a week,
> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
> caught in the spam filters.  Please don't hesitate to resend a  
> message if
> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
> --
> Pete Muir
> http://www.seamframework.org
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
>
> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than  
> a week,
> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
> caught in the spam filters.  Please don't hesitate to resend a  
> message if
> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev

--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete