[weld-dev] Decorator question

[Mark Struberg]

But if (2) is allowed, then the restriction on the Interfaces is pretty restrictive. I cannot see any additional benefit we gain from this restriction and we have to delegate all not-overridden methods via a proxy anyway.
Can you please give me a hint why this is necessary?

txs and lieGrue,
strub


--- Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com> schrieb am Fr, 4.12.2009:

> Von: Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com>
> Betreff: Re: [weld-dev] Decorator question
> An: "Marius Bogoevici" <mariusb at redhat.com>
> CC: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>, weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Datum: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009, 1:56
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:44 PM,
> Marius Bogoevici <mariusb at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > a) You can still have (2), if AnotherBeanClass
> implements an interface
> > AnInterface. It's just that the set of decorated
> methods is restricted to
> > the ones defined in the interface.
> 
> Actually, yes, that's true. I should have said that.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com