[weld-dev] Decorator question

[Gavin King]

Then I guess I don't understand exactly what it is that you want here...

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> wrote:
> Gavin,
>
> my main concern is to pass the TCK.
>
> Beside that, I really don't like to propose new use cases (even if there is one: with @Alternative, you'd need to subclass every class down the type hierarchy yourself, with @Decorator 'extends', you'd be able to decorate the baseclass and that would be applied to all subclasses automagically).
>
> Maybe the TCK folks can look at the CatDecorator, and add a bit more Decorator tests, so we have a set of facts we can both rely on? txs!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com> schrieb am Fr, 4.12.2009:
>
>> Von: Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com>
>> Betreff: Re: [weld-dev] Decorator question
>> An: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
>> CC: "Marius Bogoevici" <mariusb at redhat.com>, weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Datum: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009, 17:51
>> Look, I just don't see the usecase
>> for what you're proposing.
>>
>> If you're trying to extend a concrete class, override some
>> of its
>> methods, and delegate some methods back to the superclass,
>> just make
>> your subclass an @Alternative and call super.
>>
>> I simply don't see the usecase for having a whole stack of
>> these
>> things. I don't think anyone needs this.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
>> wrote:
>> > But if (2) is allowed, then the restriction on the
>> Interfaces is pretty restrictive. I cannot see any
>> additional benefit we gain from this restriction and we have
>> to delegate all not-overridden methods via a proxy anyway.
>> > Can you please give me a hint why this is necessary?
>> >
>> > txs and lieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> >
>> > --- Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com>
>> schrieb am Fr, 4.12.2009:
>> >
>> >> Von: Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com>
>> >> Betreff: Re: [weld-dev] Decorator question
>> >> An: "Marius Bogoevici" <mariusb at redhat.com>
>> >> CC: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>,
>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >> Datum: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009, 1:56
>> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:44 PM,
>> >> Marius Bogoevici <mariusb at redhat.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > a) You can still have (2), if
>> AnotherBeanClass
>> >> implements an interface
>> >> > AnInterface. It's just that the set of
>> decorated
>> >> methods is restricted to
>> >> > the ones defined in the interface.
>> >>
>> >> Actually, yes, that's true. I should have said
>> that.
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________
>> > Do You Yahoo!?
>> > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen
>> herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
>> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> http://hibernate.org
>> http://seamframework.org
>>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>



-- 
Gavin King
gavin.king at gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org