[webbeans-dev] wb-ri-int deployers tests

[Dan Allen]

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On 20 Jul 2009, at 09:24, Ales Justin wrote:
>
> >>> Since we add WB Bootstrap bean into top level deployment,
> >>> that top level needs to see wb-core.jar (which is what wasn't
> >>> happening with WBINT-16).
> >> NB we have https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WBINT-17 which
> >> removes the need for adding the jar into the deployment (it can
> >> just be a library jar) which should mean that non-isolated CL will
> >> work (assuming we also do https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WBINT-18)
> >> .
> >
> > The original idea was to add this dynamically depending on the
> > version of WB.
>
> I don't think this is useful as WB is a core part of EE6, so we will
> always have only one "supported" [1] version of WB.
>
> [1] which we run the TCK against etc.
>
> I'm not convinced that encouraging people to use X versions of WB in
> AS is a good idea really ;-) People should be coding against a 299
> version, which remains stable. Only case is if we have people relying
> on buggy behaviour....


Even then you would likely replace the official version with an older
version, as opposed to running two at the same time.

Btw, if you were to allow for multiple versions of WB, then you would also
open the door to multiple versions of EJB. As Pete said, part of the value
proposition of the AS is to have a single, sanctioned versions of these APIs
and implementations present.

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20090720/03ff7627/attachment.html