[webbeans-dev] TCK-Test --> ProducerFieldDefinitionTest#testNonStaticProducerFieldNotInherited

[Mark Struberg]

Pete,

1st, thanks for your help. We usually don't run the coverage reports of the RI because we do not like to look at your code too much. This shouldn't get a 1:1 copy of the RI but should proof that the Spec (+TCK) is enough to build a whole new JSR-299 implementation.

txs and LieGrue,
strub

--- Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> schrieb am So, 15.3.2009:

> Von: Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> Betreff: Re: [webbeans-dev] TCK-Test --> ProducerFieldDefinitionTest#testNonStaticProducerFieldNotInherited
> An: "Gurkan Erdogdu" <gurkanerdogdu at yahoo.com>
> CC: webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Datum: Sonntag, 15. März 2009, 0:28
> Yes, this is why it is essential to
> read the coverage report at the same time to understand what
> is being tested.
> 
> On 14 Mar 2009, at 23:25, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> 
> > 
> > It is very difficult to understand TCK tests that are
> written by others and it gets so much time. So questions are
> inevitable.
> > 
> > In the mean time, Pete thanks for helping and
> commenting. After that, I will attach  jira issues for
> all other my questions.
> > 
> > Cheers;
> > 
> > Gurkan
> > 
> > From: Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> > To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 1:05:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] TCK-Test -->
> ProducerFieldDefinitionTest#testNonStaticProducerFieldNotInherited
> > 
> > No, this is testing that producer fields aren't
> inherited by default.
> > 
> > I suggest you read the spec-assertion matched, and
> reference in the coverage report http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/jsr299-tck-impl/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/jsr299-tck-impl-1.0.0-20090313.233243-59-coverage.html
> > 
> > This list really isn't the right place to discuss this
> - please either open JIRA issues or forum topics.
> > 
> > On 14 Mar 2009, at 22:53, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi ;
> > >
> > > In this test, InfertileChicken is selected for
> Chicken API type, because DeploymentType precedence is
> higher than Chicken. So *egg* field is called over
> InfertileChicken.(Field parent instance API Type = Chicken
> and Binding Type = @Current)
> > >
> > > But test is contradicted to this. Or any other
> semantic exist?
> > >
> > > @AnotherDeploymentType
> > > class InfertileChicken extends Chicken
> > > {
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > class Chicken
> > > {
> > >
> > >    @Produces @Foo
> > >    private Egg egg = new Egg(this);
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > Thanks;
> > >
> > > Gurkan
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > webbeans-dev mailing list
> > > webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
> > 
> > --
> > Pete Muir
> > http://www.seamframework.org
> > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> Pete Muir
> http://www.seamframework.org
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
> 
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>