[webbeans-dev] Spec Conflicts Between JSR-299, JSR-318

[pmuir at redhat.com]

I spoke to andrew about this, and my understanding of his underlying  
concern is around reciprocity - that the ejb spec should mention that  
an impl should allow for jsr299 style injection at this post  
instantiation point and also that the spec should say that and impl  
may be expected to remove session objects for jsr299. An analagous  
case is ejb etc injection into servlet - the servlet spec says it  
should happen, but doesn't provide a spec'd callback for it.

And there is the question of plyggability (spec defined api for these  
things, but that is out of scope for ee6 afaik).

--
Pete Muir
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete

On 18 Mar 2009, at 05:19, Andrew Lee Rubinger <alr at jboss.org> wrote:

> Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
>> EJB defines no callback mechanism for a hypothetical  
>> @PostInstanciated before @PostConstruct.  Thus there's no hook  
>> defined for WB to do its magic.
>
> I should note that the current WB impl gets around this by way of  
> the SessionBeanInterceptor, which is a nice solution for JBoss  -  
> but I wonder what other vendors are going to be able to do.
>
> S,
> ALR
>
> -- 
> Andrew Lee Rubinger
> Sr. Software Engineer
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat, Inc.
> http://exitcondition.alrubinger.com
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev