[webbeans-dev] Typing of XML elements

[Pete Muir]

Yes, that would be one way to implement it. Though I would properly do  
this under the ee namespace...

On 20 Mar 2009, at 07:14, Nicklas Karlsson wrote:

> Back to the issue at hand ;-)
>
> So. Is my understanding correct that we would have one hand-written
> webbeans.xsd somewhere that defines that a beanType can have children
> that are constructor parameters, methods and fields and they have
> corresponding methodType, fieldType etc that describe them and then
> the schema.xsd:s which are generated dynamically just describe the
> structure of the classes and refer to wb:beanType, wb:fieldType,
> wb:methodType etc?
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Jason T. Greene
> <jason.greene at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>>>
>>> <xs:element name="bindingElement" type="bindingType"/>
>>>
>>> <xs:complexType name="classType">
>>>  <xs:sequence>
>>>    <xs:element ref="bindingElement"/>
>>>  </xs:sequence>
>>> </xs:complexType>
>>>
>>> // in the sales namespace
>>> <xs:element name="Bar" substitutionGroup="webbeans:bindingElement"/>
>>>
>>> // in the acme namespace
>>> <xs:element name="Foo" type="classType"/>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You also want to make bindingElement abstract (abstract=true).
>>
>> --
>> Jason T. Greene
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> _______________________________________________
>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> ---
> Nik

--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete