[weld-dev] Java SE extension

[Pete Muir]

On 23 Nov 2009, at 09:03, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:

> 
> On 21 nov. 09, at 19:36, Gavin King wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> * I would prefer to not actually bootstrap Weld core inside the  
>>> Weld constructor (I believe this should be an explicit step), hence  
>>> the boot() method. We could rename this to initialize() for  
>>> example. Opinions?
>> 
>> Fine by me. Especially since that at some stage we will need to pass
>> some kind of settings before booting.
> 
> Which probably means you don't want Weld to host both the  
> configuration and the operation methods
> 
> WeldContainer weld = new Weld().initialize();
> weld.instance().select(Foo.class).get();

Yes, this seems sensible to me, as it will allow us to provide flexibility with the configuration in the future.