[weld-dev] non-visable classes and constructors

[Gavin King]

Huh? The spec does not in any way limit the visibility of the bean  
constructor. So any visibility must be supported!

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:21 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

> Yes, the spec makes no statements here I know of. I don't think the  
> TCK should restrict the impl like that anyway, so please file a  
> CDKTCK issue (and say the FQCN, as there are multiple classes called  
> MissileInterceptor).
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 30 Nov 2009, at 09:13, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>> Gavin,
>>
>> The spec imho says nothing about the visibility of constructors  
>> (e.g. in 3.1.1. and others).
>> But the TCK sometimes assumes that even package scoped classes  
>> (e.g. MissileInterceptor) which can _not_ be constructed with new  
>> must be injected. This feels a bit unnatural to me since there may  
>> be a very good reason to hide e.g. private constructors or even  
>> whole classes.
>>
>> Have I overseen something in the spec or do we need to clarify some  
>> parts?
>>
>> Txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden  
>> Schutz gegen Massenmails.
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev