[weld-dev] Fwd: @AroundInvoke -- JCDI vs EJB3 and return type Object?

[Sven Linstaedt]

Is this a minor bug in the spec? If this s the case, please also review the
example in 9.5.1.
br, Sven

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sven Linstaedt <sven.linstaedt at googlemail.com>
Date: 2009/10/23
Subject: Re: @AroundInvoke -- JCDI vs EJB3 and return type Object?
To: openwebbeans-dev at incubator.apache.org


At a first glance I would consider this a bug in the example. I can not
imagine Gavin introduced some kind of "special interceptors for void
returning methods". This would rather be a use case for decorators.
I will forward your question to the jboss list, if you don't mind.
Besides... thanks for for the review.

br, Sven


2009/10/22 Eric Covener <covener at apache.org>

 Interceptor methods with @AroundInvoke in EJB3 requires a return type
> of Object, which is enforced by
> WebBeansUtil.java::checkAroundInvokeAnnotationCriterias().    In EJB3,
> Interceptors return InvocationContext.proceed() to their caller.
>
> However it seems that @AroundInvoke in JCDI is documented somewhat
> differently -- in the JCDI spec (1.3.6) the example has a void return
> type and just calls InvocationContext.proceed().
>
> Should the JCDI spec example look just like EJB3, or is this an
> OWB-specific restriction?
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> covener at gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20091023/3cfaf2c5/attachment.html