[weld-dev] Fwd: @AroundInvoke -- JCDI vs EJB3 and return type Object?

[Marius Bogoevici]

I think it is a minor bug in the spec as well. In fact in Weld we do
enforce this requirement (that @AroundInvoke is compliant with the EJB3
spec and @AroundInvoke interceptor methods must return an Object).

Marius

On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 18:56 +0200, Sven Linstaedt wrote:

> Is this a minor bug in the spec? If this s the case, please also
> review the example in 9.5.1.
> 
> 
> 
> br, Sven
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sven Linstaedt <sven.linstaedt at googlemail.com>
> Date: 2009/10/23
> Subject: Re: @AroundInvoke -- JCDI vs EJB3 and return type Object?
> To: openwebbeans-dev at incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> At a first glance I would consider this a bug in the example. I can
> not imagine Gavin introduced some kind of "special interceptors for
> void returning methods". This would rather be a use case for
> decorators.
> 
> 
> 
> I will forward your question to the jboss list, if you don't mind.
> Besides... thanks for for the review.
> 
> 
> br, Sven
> 
> 
> 
> 2009/10/22 Eric Covener <covener at apache.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         Interceptor methods with @AroundInvoke in EJB3 requires a
>         return type
>         of Object, which is enforced by
>         WebBeansUtil.java::checkAroundInvokeAnnotationCriterias().
>          In EJB3,
>         Interceptors return InvocationContext.proceed() to their
>         caller.
>         
>         However it seems that @AroundInvoke in JCDI is documented
>         somewhat
>         differently -- in the JCDI spec (1.3.6) the example has a void
>         return
>         type and just calls InvocationContext.proceed().
>         
>         Should the JCDI spec example look just like EJB3, or is this
>         an
>         OWB-specific restriction?
>         
>         --
>         Eric Covener
>         covener at gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20091023/0089bca6/attachment.html