[webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?
Mark Struberg
struberg at yahoo.de
Fri Sep 4 13:48:28 EDT 2009
apparently yes:
http://atinject.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/javax/inject/Named.java
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?
> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> Cc: "Takeshi Kondo" <takeshi.kondo at gmail.com>, webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 6:36 PM
> @Named is a qualifier in 330? That makes
> absolutely no sense. I think that linkage should be
> severed.
> - Dan Allen
> Sent from my Android-powered G1 phone:
>
> An open platform for carriers, developers
>
> and consumers.
> On Sep 4, 2009 8:09 AM,
> "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> wrote:
>
> Oh, we had exact the same discussion over at OpenWebBeans
> today.
>
>
>
>
> What about re-introducing @BindingType again but making it
> an @Qualifier?
>
>
>
> In fact, JSR-330 @Qualifier says nothing about type safety
> and resolution at all, so this is basically undefined afaik.
> So having a well defined @BindingType again would imho be a
> good thing.
>
>
>
> LieGrue,
>
> strub
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 9/2/09, Takeshi Kondo <takeshi.kondo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > From: Takeshi Kondo <takeshi.kondo at gmail.com>
>
> > Subject: [webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?
>
> > To: webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>
> > Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 8:45 PM
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm a bit confused about @Named annotation.
> > @Named is qualifier in jsr-330. However in
> w...
>
More information about the weld-dev
mailing list