[weld-dev] Maven Archetype Bill of Materials - How should we handle minor variations in point releases of Java EE 6 containers?

[Shelly McGowan]

Pete,

This morning I released the jboss-javaee_6.0_spec, 1.0.0.Beta3. 

http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/spec/jboss-javaee_6.0_spec/1.0.0.Beta3


This release contains fix for JBEE-33 - update to use JACC 1.4.


Shelly McGowan
JBoss, by Red Hat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir at redhat.com>
To: "Steven Boscarine" <steven.boscarine at childrens.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Weld-Dev List" <weld-dev at lists.jboss.org>, smcgowan at redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 8:00:35 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Maven Archetype Bill of Materials - How should we handle minor variations in point releases of Java EE 6 containers?

Shelly has pointed us at http://repository.jboss.org/maven2//org/jboss/spec/jboss-javaee_6.0_spec/1.0.0.Beta2/jboss-javaee_6.0_spec-1.0.0.Beta2.pom which works great as a jboss-6.0.0-bom. Unfortunately, Sun control the javax namespace, and don't publish a BOM for Java EE, so producing one of these is much harder.

I suggest we stick with the JBoss one for now, along with instructions on how to create one for other app servers.

WDYT?

On 12 Apr 2010, at 16:47, Steven Boscarine wrote:

> Hello All,
> The Weld archetypes need to be updated to reflect the latest Weld 1.0.1 
> release.
> 
> Presently, we're using the weld-extensions-bom
> 
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.jboss.weld</groupId>
> <artifactId>weld-extensions-bom</artifactId>
> <version>1.0.0-CR2</version>
> <type>pom</type>
> <scope>import</scope>
> </dependency>
> 
> The immediate issue is that the archetypes need to reflect the changes.
> 
> The hairier issue is dealing with minor point release differences
> 
> Now there's 2 variants of weld in the wild, via 2 Java EE containers.  
> Glassfish has weld-1.0.0 and JBoss 6 will have 1.0.1.  Should this be 
> reflected via different BOMs?
> 
> Should there be a weld-jboss-6.0.0-bom? glassfish-v3-bom?  Presumably, 
> down the road, there will be more variants as other APIs have minor 
> point increases.
> 
> If not, does anyone have suggestions for dealing with trivial variations 
> in versions between container point releases?
> 
> Thanks,
> Steven
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev