[wildfly-dev] Put MyFaces JSF into WildFly?

[Andrig Miller]

I think if we should see what product management thinks about his, in terms of the choice.  Do we have customers on EAP that are demanding this?

Andy

----- Original Message -----
> From: ssilvert at redhat.com
> To: "Andrig Miller" <anmiller at redhat.com>
> Cc: wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org, "Burr Sutter" <bsutter at redhat.com>, "Brian Leathem" <bleathem at redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 1:18:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] Put MyFaces JSF into WildFly?
> 
> I should have added, I personally have no problem supporting both in
> EAP
> if that's what we decide to do.
> 
> JSF is kind of unique in that for many years there have been two
> well-accepted implementations.  Both have their strengths and
> weaknesses.  Neither is going away.
> 
> So the upside of shipping both is that we would be the only ones
> providing a choice.  Developers could even defer their choice of
> implementations until after their application is finished.  Then pick
> the one that runs best for them.
> 
> On 7/8/2013 2:50 PM, Andrig Miller wrote:
> > My personal opinion on this, is that we should not ship two
> > implementations.  I know this is in the community, so it doesn't
> > cause any issue with support as we don't have to ship both in EAP.
> >  Having said that, if people in the community adopt MyFaces, and
> > then move to EAP, and its not there, its just another thing that
> > causes a problem for adoption of EAP.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: ssilvert at redhat.com
> >> To: wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 11:31:27 AM
> >> Subject: [wildfly-dev] Put MyFaces JSF into WildFly?
> >>
> >> Ever since we switched from MyFaces to Mojarra I've incurred the
> >> wrath
> >> of MyFaces fans.  Regardless of the relative quality of each
> >> implementation, we have stuck with Mojarra because it always
> >> implements
> >> the latest spec long before MyFaces.  Now is no exception as
> >> Mojarra
> >> fully supports JSF 2.2 and MyFaces 2.2 is incomplete.
> >>
> >> However, with Multi-JSF in place, it is now trivial to ship both
> >> implementations and allow the end user to choose which one they
> >> like
> >> best.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on this?
> >>
> >> Stan
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> wildfly-dev mailing list
> >> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >>
> 
>