[wildfly-dev] Change CLI to Default to Remoting
Brian Stansberry
brian.stansberry at redhat.com
Wed Jul 10 13:54:18 EDT 2013
On 7/10/13 6:26 AM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
>
> Am 09.07.2013 um 18:41 schrieb Brian Stansberry:
>> Remember also that people will use the new CLI binary to manage legacy
>> servers where HTTP upgrade is not an option. So even if by default WF
>> isn't using 9999, there will be need for the CLI to deal cleanly with 9999.
>
> And the other way around.
>
The issue there is whether port 9999 is even open. Jason has commented
he wants to eliminate it by default for WF 8. I'm personally just so-so
about that idea, but can't really make a good argument against it.[1] A
user can turn 9999 back on though if desired; the capability isn't being
removed.
If 9999 is open an older CLI will have no problem dealing with WF 8.
[1] I see this as kind of like ripping off a band-aid. At some point
external forces are going to force us toward using a minimal-port-count
default config. So if the band-aid is going to eventual come all the way
off, best to hurry up and get it over with.
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
More information about the wildfly-dev
mailing list