[windup-dev] Windup legacy rules rewriting

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

I do remember this discussion, and I think that while it's one possible
solution, it's not really beneficial to have the separated out into
non-java files. In this particular scenario, I do think that writing
multiple rules is probably not what we want, but we do probably want to
keep the data in Java, in the ConfigurationProvider or a closely related
class.

Matej was just doing what he thought we asked him to do, literally port the
rules 1:1. He now understands we meant "port the functionality." :)


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> just a note on $SUBJ. I may be wrong, but I recall we agreed that the
> old rules, since being so monotonous, could have one rule, which would
> load the simple data from a static file(s), and one rule which would
> execute them. E.g. a simple .csv file with regex, hint, reference. Or
> JSON/XML if needed.
>
> Now Matej creates one java rule per each legacy regex.
> Is there some change in the previous plan?
> Both solutions have obvious advantages, I just want to know what was the
> decision.
>
> Thanks,
> Ondra
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-dev/attachments/20140715/a53d23e8/attachment.html