[windup-dev] RuleModel et al.
Brad Davis
bdavis at redhat.com
Tue Jul 22 19:45:41 EDT 2014
There are graph listeners already I'm pretty sure.
Brad Davis
Red Hat Consulting
Email: bdavis at redhat.com | c:980.226.7865 |http://www.redhat.com
> On Jul 22, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> 1) A reference to the rule being executed could be made accessible from a context.
> 2) Some layer above Frames could catch any creation/alteration of vertices and link them.
>
> Haven't seen Frames guts, perhaps not doable easily at the moment.
>
>
>> On 22.7.2014 17:30, Jess Sightler wrote:
>> But how does it know which vertices were created (or modified) by that rule?
>>
>>> On 07/22/2014 10:57 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>>> The rule executor (RuleSubset) could actually handle doing this I think. For each rule it executes, set the ID, the version, and the phase in the graph (and possibly also a stringification of what the rule consists of)
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Jess Sightler <jsightle at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Oh, I see... if we are going to do this, I could see it having a few things:
>>>>
>>>> 1. RuleID - A string uniquely identifying the rule
>>>> 2. Rule Version - The version of the addon containing the rule
>>>> 3. RulePhase - The phase during which the rule was run
>>>>
>>>> I don't think that this belongs in reporting, though. I am also not sure
>>>> how easy it would be to automate the population of these fields, though
>>>> it might be possible with some tweaks to frames.
>>>>
>>>> On 07/21/2014 08:59 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
>>>> > So far, an ID and a reference to the Ruleset. The ruleset then would
>>>> > probably have further info, like, version etc.
>>>> >
>>>> > https://github.com/OndraZizka/windup/blob/3940b146f811ab6e5fff1cb6c6def7179a33a467/reporting/api/src/main/java/org/jboss/windup/reporting/model/RuleModel.java
>>>> >
>>>> > Anyway, even if it was just an ID, OOP principles suggest to encapsulate
>>>> > that ID to a type. My experience agrees. I may be wrong though.
>>>> >
>>>> > Ondra
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 22.7.2014 02:40, Jess Sightler wrote:
>>>> >> I'm not opposed to this idea... except that I don't know what a
>>>> >> "RuleModel" would actually contain, other than the ID.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> What are you proposing it to contain?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 07/21/2014 07:03 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
>>>> >>> We should have $subj:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> We need to refer to the rules in the report.
>>>> >>> We agreed to store all information in the graph.
>>>> >>> Current ID is not guaranteed to be the same over runs.
>>>> >>> Current ID has no namespaces.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> my2c.
>>>> >>> Ondra
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>> windup-dev mailing list
>>>> >>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> windup-dev mailing list
>>>> >> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > windup-dev mailing list
>>>> > windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> windup-dev mailing list
>>>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> windup-dev mailing list
>>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> windup-dev mailing list
>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-dev/attachments/20140722/7589fff2/attachment.html
More information about the windup-dev
mailing list