[windup-dev] RuleModel et al.

[Jess Sightler]

It does look like there is an EventGraph that could make this easier:
http://www.tinkerpop.com/docs/javadocs/blueprints/2.0.0/com/tinkerpop/blueprints/util/wrappers/event/EventGraph.html

I have filed a JIRA for us to enable this:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WINDUP-149

On 07/22/2014 07:45 PM, Brad Davis wrote:
> There are graph listeners already I'm pretty sure.
>
> Brad Davis
> Red Hat Consulting
> Email: bdavis at redhat.com <mailto:bdavis at redhat.com> | c:980.226.7865 
> <tel:980.226.7865> |http://www.redhat.com <http://www.redhat.com/>
>
> On Jul 22, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com 
> <mailto:ozizka at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>> 1) A reference to the rule being executed could be made accessible 
>> from a context.
>> 2) Some layer above Frames could catch any creation/alteration of 
>> vertices and link them.
>>
>> Haven't seen Frames guts, perhaps not doable easily at the moment.
>>
>>
>> On 22.7.2014 17:30, Jess Sightler wrote:
>>> But how does it know which vertices were created (or modified) by 
>>> that rule?
>>>
>>> On 07/22/2014 10:57 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>>>> The rule executor (RuleSubset) could actually handle doing this I 
>>>> think. For each rule it executes, set the ID, the version, and the 
>>>> phase in the graph (and possibly also a stringification of what the 
>>>> rule consists of)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Jess Sightler 
>>>> <jsightle at redhat.com <mailto:jsightle at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Oh, I see... if we are going to do this, I could see it having
>>>>     a few things:
>>>>
>>>>     1. RuleID - A string uniquely identifying the rule
>>>>     2. Rule Version - The version of the addon containing the rule
>>>>     3. RulePhase - The phase during which the rule was run
>>>>
>>>>     I don't think that this belongs in reporting, though. I am also
>>>>     not sure
>>>>     how easy it would be to automate the population of these
>>>>     fields, though
>>>>     it might be possible with some tweaks to frames.
>>>>
>>>>     On 07/21/2014 08:59 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
>>>>     > So far, an ID and a reference to the Ruleset. The ruleset
>>>>     then would
>>>>     > probably have further info, like, version etc.
>>>>     >
>>>>     >
>>>>     https://github.com/OndraZizka/windup/blob/3940b146f811ab6e5fff1cb6c6def7179a33a467/reporting/api/src/main/java/org/jboss/windup/reporting/model/RuleModel.java
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Anyway, even if it was just an ID, OOP principles suggest to
>>>>     encapsulate
>>>>     > that ID to a type. My experience agrees. I may be wrong though.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Ondra
>>>>     >
>>>>     >
>>>>     > On 22.7.2014 02:40, Jess Sightler wrote:
>>>>     >> I'm not opposed to this idea... except that I don't know what a
>>>>     >> "RuleModel" would actually contain, other than the ID.
>>>>     >>
>>>>     >> What are you proposing it to contain?
>>>>     >>
>>>>     >> On 07/21/2014 07:03 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
>>>>     >>> We should have $subj:
>>>>     >>>
>>>>     >>> We need to refer to the rules in the report.
>>>>     >>> We agreed to store all information in the graph.
>>>>     >>> Current ID is not guaranteed to be the same over runs.
>>>>     >>> Current ID has no namespaces.
>>>>     >>>
>>>>     >>> my2c.
>>>>     >>> Ondra
>>>>     >>>
>>>>     >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>     >>> windup-dev mailing list
>>>>     >>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>     >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>>     >> _______________________________________________
>>>>     >> windup-dev mailing list
>>>>     >> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>     >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>>     > _______________________________________________
>>>>     > windup-dev mailing list
>>>>     > windup-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>     > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     windup-dev mailing list
>>>>     windup-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> windup-dev mailing list
>>>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> windup-dev mailing list
>>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> windup-dev mailing list
>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-dev/attachments/20140725/42612d35/attachment-0001.html