glen at thoughtcraft.com
Thu Sep 20 22:52:40 EDT 2012
On 9/20/12 9:29 PM, Douglas Campos wrote:
> 1) Why there is no history on the project? (and consequently, ownership history - passos contributed code hasn't got attribution)
> - even in cases of big rewrites and start-overs, it's nice to keep the commits, as the history of the incremental changes say a lot about the rationale/train of thought that lead to the final solution
(See last msg)
> 2) Why aren't we following the maven project layout, as suggested by the archetype we are using?
We're following a simple convention for the Android maven plugin
(http://code.google.com/p/maven-android-plugin/). You can see a similar
The idea is that it's an Android project first and a maven project second.
> 3) Why the API and the example app are intermixed?
> - Ideally these should be separate repositories, like the iOS version
Definitely! This is mentioned in TODO comments in the code. I wanted
to get the prototype up quickly to link it to
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-353, and didn't have time to
both merge in the new UI and split out the API jar. Next on my list.
More information about the aerogear-dev