[forge-dev] automatic dependency detection problem

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

> @reverse engineer: I had a go with the hibernate plugin, but I found, that
> it produces field access annotations, which I do not like.
> So I simply used Eclipse Hibernate tools (JBoss plugin??) to reverse
> engineer my database and then copied the sources into a Forge project.
> Works great, that's exactly what I expected from a tool like Forge :-))
>

Awesome! I am happy to hear that it works!! The hibernate tools plugin
sometimes had not worked for people in the past, so I was wondering if
there were any difficulties getting it to work :) Glad it did! But it
sounds like we need to improve it a little bit.. add some configuration
options. etc..

~Lincoln

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Frühbeck <fruehbeck at aon.at> wrote:

>  Yes, I would like to have it "mainstreamed", I just wanted to be sure to
> understand how things work before I come up with a proposal. There are some
> problematic points in the scaffold, which will not easily be managed by
> inheritance e.g. BackingBean.jv, so I am convinced, that only a clean and
> clear design can make it work.
> No, I do _not_ want to create a parallel development, it just looks like
> you are in the middle of closing 1.0..
>
> Anyhow I made a git project " plugin-faces-idaware" on github.com, so you
> can have a look at my changes anytime - please not yet, the issues with
> package visibility are still a problem. I'm not so used to git yet, though
> I gradually tend to get hooked :-)
> I promise I will send a pull request when it's stable enough to have it
> integrated. I really do think that stability of the seam plugin is key for
> the success of Forge.
>
> @reverse engineer: I had a go with the hibernate plugin, but I found, that
> it produces field access annotations, which I do not like.
> So I simply used Eclipse Hibernate tools (JBoss plugin??) to reverse
> engineer my database and then copied the sources into a Forge project.
> Works great, that's exactly what I expected from a tool like Forge :-))
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> Am 12.02.2012 15:52, schrieb Lincoln Baxter, III:
>
> First,
>
> It's awesome that you've been getting into the Inspectors and
> WidgetBuilders! I think that's great!
>
> It sounds like you starting creating a new scaffold because there were
> some problems with the existing one.
>
> My question is:
>
> "Are there enough differences between the Faces scaffold and the one that
> you are writing, that you think they should be separate?" OR do you think
> we should just fix what is wrong with the existing one? (I would lean
> toward fixing it, and adding extension points for any places where you want
> things to be different :)
>
> What do you think?
>
> I'd love to help you however I can to make this happen.
>
> We usually just use Pull requests and JIRA issues to track this type of
> work so that everyone can stay in sync! Sound like something you're
> interested in? It's ok that you don't have much time - this is open source!
>
> ~Lincoln
>
> PS. Which type of database engineering did you use? Forge? How did it work
> for you?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>


-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120213/4a9cea7c/attachment.html