[Hawkular-dev] Packaging

Gary Brown gbrown at redhat.com
Tue May 12 07:33:41 EDT 2015


Hi

At present I'm looking to layer BTM on top of Kettle, as it is a client of the components but not currently going to be bundled as part of Kettle as I currently understand.

So BTM will have its own distribution that repackages Kettle+BTM. Is that ok?

Regards
Gary

----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
> 	I would prefer if the whole WF packaging/layering would happen in
> Hawkular rather than with multiple layers of packaging as it is today.
> 
> 	So far I have done 2 things:
> 		1 - Basically renamed Kettle to Hawkular (+ few extras). kettle
> directory is now 'dist' which should be more intuitive.
> 	 
> https://github.com/theute/hawkular/commit/e2b937b467e4ed8c184b51add5af7b50175bd549
> 
> 		2 - Bring the nest distro build from Bus to Hawkular:
> 	 
> https://github.com/theute/hawkular/commit/84ed6f505a5db73ecf9264c1bc8dea3d314649e0
> 		I understand that there could still be need for the nest (I think
> Alert uses it for testing) but I find the double customization of WF
> quite complex.
> 
> My next items unless I am stopped:
> 		- Fix the docker build as I guess I broke it
> 		- do more proper WF layering (not use 'modules/base')
> 		- understand "hawkular-nest-wf-extension" ;)
> 		- upgrade to WF9
> 		- update the docs
> 
> Thomas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
> 


More information about the hawkular-dev mailing list