[Hawkular-dev] Packaging

[Thomas Heute]

On 05/12/2015 01:33 PM, Gary Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> At present I'm looking to layer BTM on top of Kettle, as it is a client of the components but not currently going to be bundled as part of Kettle as I currently understand.
> So BTM will have its own distribution that repackages Kettle+BTM. Is that ok?

I think BTM should be part of Hawkular (/Kettle)

Thomas

>
> Regards
> Gary
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>>
>> 	I would prefer if the whole WF packaging/layering would happen in
>> Hawkular rather than with multiple layers of packaging as it is today.
>>
>> 	So far I have done 2 things:
>> 		1 - Basically renamed Kettle to Hawkular (+ few extras). kettle
>> directory is now 'dist' which should be more intuitive.
>> 	
>> https://github.com/theute/hawkular/commit/e2b937b467e4ed8c184b51add5af7b50175bd549
>>
>> 		2 - Bring the nest distro build from Bus to Hawkular:
>> 	
>> https://github.com/theute/hawkular/commit/84ed6f505a5db73ecf9264c1bc8dea3d314649e0
>> 		I understand that there could still be need for the nest (I think
>> Alert uses it for testing) but I find the double customization of WF
>> quite complex.
>>
>> My next items unless I am stopped:
>> 		- Fix the docker build as I guess I broke it
>> 		- do more proper WF layering (not use 'modules/base')
>> 		- understand "hawkular-nest-wf-extension" ;)
>> 		- upgrade to WF9
>> 		- update the docs
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>