[Hawkular-dev] What should be the replacement for printlns in tests?

[John Sanda]

> On Jan 27, 2016, at 10:28 AM, Peter Palaga <ppalaga at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2016-01-27 15:32, Jay Shaughnessy wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, of course, that's the usefulness of loggers, but that doesn't mean
>> system println is worse than INFO logging in test code.
> 
> Yes, println is worse than INFO logging because there e.g. is no way how 
> you can pointedly turn printlns off for a given class.
> 
>> Meaning, to the
>> point of adding checkstyle misery.
> 
> @Matt perhaps wants to say something ? :)
> 
> Checkstyle or not, I found myself adding printlns because I have not 
> seen a better alternative.
> 
> So there is nobody here who knows how to config the test logging with 
> jboss.logging?
> 

I haven’t paid too close attention to this thread, so maybe I missed some details. But why can’t you just use logack like we do in metrics as Thomas described?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20160127/7956b6c8/attachment-0001.html