[jbosstools-dev] Review upcoming change to 4.30.5.Alpha6-SNAPSHOT target platform

Max Andersen manderse at redhat.com
Thu Jun 6 01:45:16 EDT 2013


You must have missed the planner vs slice and atlassian eclipse.core part.  Please read the whole thing. 

/max (sent from my phone)


On 05/06/2013, at 15.38, Nick Boldt <nboldt at redhat.com> wrote:

> OK, so it's now been since Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:18:04 +0200, which is more than 24hrs and the only feedback received has been discussion about the process for providing sufficient time for providing feedback in a timely manner.
> 
> This just underscores my point that waiting more than a day is unnecessary because devs will react to breakages forced upon them faster than requests to experiment w/ something new.
> 
> Glad to know nothing complain-worthy actually broke. :)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Nick
> 
> On 06/05/2013 01:29 AM, Max Andersen wrote:
>> I agree the eclipse update is trivial. If it was those alone I would say
>> it was normal.
>> 
>> It's the planner vs slicer I'm surprised about happening now and not
>> when we talked about it earlier on in good time instead of last minute.
>> 
>> If slicer vs planner changes nothing in how the TP is generated I must
>> have misunderstood it's purpose.
>> 
>> My understanding was that slicer would only include exactly what the
>> target lists (good) but planner would be able to drag in additional
>> dependencies especially optional ones - thus if you build and use the
>> .target file you get a different result - and I actually still think you.
>> 
>> But good to hear the the target mirror tool is a slicer and thus I can
>> see how at least the installer would not be affected.
>> 
>> Next time - include such info in the PR/Jira please :)
>> 
>> But that raises a question - this means only tycho or pde listens to
>> this mode and target to repo ignores it ?
>> 
>> Seems somewhat inconsistent?
>> /max (sent from my phone)
>> 
>> 
>> On 04/06/2013, at 23.57, Mickael Istria <mistria at redhat.com
>> <mailto:mistria at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 06/04/2013 11:33 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> Await approvals from build, affected team leads and project lead(s).
>>>> In case of urgency build + one project lead is considered ok, but
>>>> should be the exception.
>>> Updates of Eclipse version are specifically affecting no-one, and I
>>> fear it's not about to get much feedback. It's a low-risk change and
>>> the later we apply it, the later we'll know whether everything works
>>> fine with newer TP.
>>> A too long feedback loop (several days) is not very possible in the RC
>>> stream with a new release of Eclipse release train every week.
>>> 
>>>> To give feedback the changes looks good on first roll but change from
>>>> planner to slicing (which I normally would consider good)
>>>> should be confirmed first. i.e. what dependencies will *not* be
>>>> included now ?
>>>> These could easily escape being detected in builds thus would be
>>>> great to outline them in such a change.
>>>> Have you compared the list of bundles in generated TP with and
>>>> without this slicing/planner mode ?
>>> It won't affect builds.
>>> The mirror-target-to-repo mojo is actually a "slicer", so the output
>>> site for target-platform does not depend on planner/slicer, it's
>>> always the same output as slicer. So moving TP from planner to slicer
>>> in multiple makes it easier/faster to detect mistakes that used to
>>> occur only while validation unified target. Those issues are now
>>> detected while validating multiple (about 1 hour earlier).
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Mickael Istria
>>> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
>>> My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
>>> <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> 
> -- 
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com



More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list