[rules-users] Odd static inner class behavior

[Edson Tirelli]

    Eric,

    Not sure if I understood your problem, but if you have multiple classes
with the same name, and the only difference is that they are inner classes
of different classes, I guess what you need to do is to fully qualify your
class names in your rules...

rule xxx
when
    my.package.MyClass.MyInnerClass( ... )
...
end

   If this is not your problem, can you please show us an example so we
understand it better?

   Edson


2007/7/25, Eric Miles <eric.miles at kronos.com>:
>
>  Due to how JAXB treats anonymous inner complex types, I ended up with a
> public static inner classes named AlternativeKey in several of my data
> classes  I have several rules written to deal with each data class
> individually that all work ok.  However, when I attempt to put them all in
> the same rule base (all belong to the same package), I get an import
> collision exception on the AlternativeKey inner class.  Depending on where
> in the builder I add the resource depends on which AlternativeKey the
> compiler bitches about (validity).  I'm not familiar with the source at all,
> so I'm unsure as to where to look for this.  However, this sounds like a bug
> to me?  There is an easy workaround for this as I I just don't use anonymous
> types and define them in my schema explicitly.  Just thought I'd identify
> this as a possible issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 
  Edson Tirelli
  Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070726/c48e0ed4/attachment.html