[rules-users] Operators

[Mark Proctor]

We've have plans for pluggeable operators, just no time to implement 
them, maybe in the next release :)

Mark
Yuri de Wit wrote:
> I am using JBoss Rules 3.0.6 and in many situations I was forced to
> use a Java snipped predicates ( p.property -> ( fn.doSomething(p, a))
> which clutters the rules quite a bit ) to override or correct the
> behaviour of some of the operators such as ==, !=, etc. It would be
> nice if there was an easy way for me to override them by providing my
> own implementation. I could then subclass the default one provided by
> JBoss Rules and customized the ones I need.
>
> I know that this sugestiong would allow us to modify the semantic of
> the rules language operators but it at least would provide a nice way
> out of issues (such as using == between a Short and a Integer) we come
> accross, could help debugging predicate evaluations (I guess I could
> always add a breakpoint to a specific class from the rules engine -
> which class?).
>
> On the same topic would it be possible to add new operators to the 
> language?
>
> thanks,
> -yuri
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>