[rules-users] Resuming the Flow: SESSION_ID, PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID, WORKITEM_ID

[Mauricio Salatino]

Hi Ed,
Cool, are you planning to implement your own work Item?
What will be the main functionality of your work item?
Sound to complex to implement that pattern just to keep the relationship.
Did you see the WSHT module?

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Ed Staub <estaub at telcordia.com> wrote:

>
> I'm facing similar requirements, I think.
> In many cases the other systems that I'll be working with have no place to
> stuff a WorkItem Id, etc.
>
> I'm planning to implement a " http://www.eaipatterns.com/SmartProxy.html
> Smart Proxy ", which stores in a database a mapping from:
> - a unique set of data in the request and the response
> to
> - the session-id/process-id/workitem-id necessary to resume.
>
> When a response comes in, the table will be used for correlation.
> An event monitor will clean out the table entries when a given process
> terminates.
>
> The mapping may be stored as rules - I'm not sure yet.
>
> Thoughts?  Experience?
> I'm a total drools-noob - this may make no sense.
>
> Thanks,
> -Ed Staub
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-the-Flow-SESSION-ID-PROCESS-INSTANCE-ID-WORKITEM-ID-tp607507p693680.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100402/7fb845a3/attachment.html