[rules-users] Rules categorization/packages

[Amit Kumar]

Sorry for spamming today
It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All of the
following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is there..
But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it permits me
to assign a variable to it
like Equipment(eId : entityId)
but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability in
the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
Thanks,
Amit



On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok I tried again.  :(
>
> In Equipment I only see manufacturer
>  In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
> In Software I do not see anything.
>
> It contains many more classes
>
> Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my model files
> to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post it on alias
>
> Thanks
> Amit
>
>
>   2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>
>
>> But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
>>
>> 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com>
>>
>>  Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that and convert to
>>> lower case and try. I remember facing this issue sometime back with 5.0
>>> Thanks
>>> Amit
>>>
>>>   On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Its coming from a JAR
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Amit
>>>>
>>>>     Equipment       entityId int   partNumber String   manufacturer
>>>> String   owningEntityId int   Software       entityId int   OSType
>>>> String   OSVersion String   imageName String     EquipmentCA extends
>>>> Equipment       hostname String   productName String   productFamily
>>>> String   productId String
>>>> 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative Model?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola at redhat.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell
>>>>>> me
>>>>>> what your model looks like?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Toni
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>>>>>> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
>>>>>> > They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
>>>>>> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
>>>>>> > attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not
>>>>>> > all of them.
>>>>>> > I am picking it from here
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
>>>>>> > Any other place I can look :)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks
>>>>>> > Amit
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
>>>>>> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     Thanks Jervis!!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu at redhat.com
>>>>>>  >     <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts"
>>>>>> will be
>>>>>> >         available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
>>>>>> >         asset among
>>>>>> >         different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
>>>>>> >         consider it
>>>>>> >         as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
>>>>>> >         that you
>>>>>> >         think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> >         your
>>>>>> >         current package to the global area, so that this global
>>>>>> asset
>>>>>> >         can be
>>>>>> >         reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
>>>>>> >         maybe you
>>>>>> >         want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be
>>>>>> highly
>>>>>> >         appreciated.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         Cheers,
>>>>>> >         Jervis
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         Amit Kumar wrote:
>>>>>> >         > Hello All,
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >         > I am looking to organize the rules in different
>>>>>> categories.
>>>>>> >         But for
>>>>>> >         > distribution purposes We are creating packages for
>>>>>> different
>>>>>> >         > roles/processing phases
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >         > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
>>>>>> >         can belong
>>>>>> >         > to multiple categories
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >         > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>>>>>> >         > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those
>>>>>> have sub
>>>>>> >         > categories witin them
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >         > We have rules which will device the category of the item
>>>>>> >         > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule", leather rule"
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >         > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> >         define the
>>>>>> >         > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
>>>>>> >         in Pant
>>>>>> >         > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >         > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price
>>>>>> rule
>>>>>> >         in Shirt
>>>>>> >         > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size"
>>>>>> then
>>>>>> >         I will
>>>>>> >         > have to put it in both categories
>>>>>> >         > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and "XL
>>>>>> Rule"
>>>>>> >         on "XL
>>>>>> >         > Category"  and I put the rule in both categories.. will it
>>>>>> >         be an "and"
>>>>>> >         > relationship or will be an "OR"
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >         > Regards,
>>>>>> >         > Amit
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >         > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >         > rules-users mailing list
>>>>>> >         > rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>> >         > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>> >         >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >         rules-users mailing list
>>>>>> >         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>>  >         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>>>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>>>>
>>>>> Esteban Aliverti
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>
>> Esteban Aliverti
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100316/dc74dc13/attachment.html