[rules-users] Rules categorization/packages
Toni Rikkola
trikkola at redhat.com
Wed Mar 17 02:24:34 EDT 2010
You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR
We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.
Toni
Amit Kumar wrote:
> Sorry for spamming today
> It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All
> of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is
> there..
> But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it
> permits me to assign a variable to it
> like Equipment(eId : entityId)
> but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability
> in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
> <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Ok I tried again. :(
>
> In Equipment I only see manufacturer
> In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
> In Software I do not see anything.
>
> It contains many more classes
>
> Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
> model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
> it on alias
>
> Thanks
> Amit
>
>
> 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
> <mailto:esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>>
>
> But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
>
> 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
> <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>>
>
> Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
> and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
> issue sometime back with 5.0
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
> <amitkumar at gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Its coming from a JAR
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> Equipment
> entityId int
> partNumber String
> manufacturer String
> owningEntityId int
>
>
>
> Software
> entityId int
> OSType String
> OSVersion String
> imageName String
>
>
>
>
>
>
> EquipmentCA extends Equipment
> hostname String
> productName String
> productFamily String
> productId String
>
> 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
> <mailto:esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>>
>
> Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
> a Declarative Model?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
> <trikkola at redhat.com <mailto:trikkola at redhat.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Its possible that there are some bugs in the
> snapshots. Can you tell me
> what your model looks like?
>
> Toni
>
> Amit Kumar wrote:
> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
> > They do seem rich in features .. especially
> support for
> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
> inbox and global packages.
> >
> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the
> when/then clause then all the
> > attributes of the facts are not coming ..
> some attributes come.. not
> > all of them.
> > I am picking it from here
> >
> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
> > Any other place I can look :)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Amit
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
> <amitkumar at gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com
> <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Jervis!!
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
> Jervisliu <jliu at redhat.com
> <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:jliu at redhat.com
> <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > A new feature called "Sharable
> artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
> > available in Drools 5.1. This
> feature allows you share an
> > asset among
> > different packages. It also creates
> a global area (you can
> > consider it
> > as a global package). Potentially
> you can promote an asset
> > that you
> > think is more appropriate to be
> defined in a global scope from
> > your
> > current package to the global area,
> so that this global asset
> > can be
> > reused by every package. This
> feature is already on trunk,
> > maybe you
> > want to give it a try. Any comments
> or feedbacks will be highly
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jervis
> >
> >
> > Amit Kumar wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I am looking to organize the rules
> in different categories.
> > But for
> > > distribution purposes We are
> creating packages for different
> > > roles/processing phases
> > >
> > > So a rule will reside in one
> pckage but for navigation it
> > can belong
> > > to multiple categories
> > >
> > > So packages are like Shirts,
> Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> > > Categories are Color, Material,
> Size, Gender and those have sub
> > > categories witin them
> > >
> > > We have rules which will device
> the category of the item
> > > Like "red rule", "blue rule",
> "cloth rule", leather rule"
> > >
> > > Now the problem we are facing is
> for category rules is if I
> > define the
> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I
> will not be able ot use it
> > in Pant
> > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
> > >
> > > The other problem in this scenario
> is If I have a price rule
> > in Shirt
> > > package and the category is "Blue
> Color" and "XL Size" then
> > I will
> > > have to put it in both categories
> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on
> "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
> > on "XL
> > > Category" and I put the rule in
> both categories.. will it
> > be an "and"
> > > relationship or will be an "OR"
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Amit
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > rules-users mailing list
> > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
> > >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
More information about the rules-users
mailing list