[rules-users] Rules categorization/packages
Esteban Aliverti
esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 10:58:37 EDT 2010
It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a part
of it).
Best,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola at redhat.com> wrote:
> You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR
>
> We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.
>
> Toni
>
> Amit Kumar wrote:
> > Sorry for spamming today
> > It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All
> > of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is
> > there..
> > But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it
> > permits me to assign a variable to it
> > like Equipment(eId : entityId)
> > but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability
> > in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
> > Thanks,
> > Amit
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Ok I tried again. :(
> >
> > In Equipment I only see manufacturer
> > In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
> > In Software I do not see anything.
> >
> > It contains many more classes
> >
> > Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
> > model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
> > it on alias
> >
> > Thanks
> > Amit
> >
> >
> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>>
> >
> > But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
> >
> > 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>>
> >
> > Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
> > and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
> > issue sometime back with 5.0
> > Thanks
> > Amit
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
> > <amitkumar at gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Its coming from a JAR
> > Thanks
> > Amit
> >
> > Equipment
> > entityId int
> > partNumber String
> > manufacturer String
> > owningEntityId int
> >
> >
> >
> > Software
> > entityId int
> > OSType String
> > OSVersion String
> > imageName String
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > EquipmentCA extends Equipment
> > hostname String
> > productName String
> > productFamily String
> > productId String
> >
> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>>
> >
> > Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
> > a Declarative Model?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
> > <trikkola at redhat.com <mailto:trikkola at redhat.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Its possible that there are some bugs in the
> > snapshots. Can you tell me
> > what your model looks like?
> >
> > Toni
> >
> > Amit Kumar wrote:
> > > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
> > > They do seem rich in features .. especially
> > support for
> > > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
> > inbox and global packages.
> > >
> > > But But But.. on adding a fact in the
> > when/then clause then all the
> > > attributes of the facts are not coming ..
> > some attributes come.. not
> > > all of them.
> > > I am picking it from here
> > >
> >
> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
> > > Any other place I can look :)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Amit
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
> > <amitkumar at gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com
> >
> > > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com
> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Jervis!!
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
> > Jervisliu <jliu at redhat.com
> > <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>
> > > <mailto:jliu at redhat.com
> > <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > A new feature called "Sharable
> > artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
> > > available in Drools 5.1. This
> > feature allows you share an
> > > asset among
> > > different packages. It also creates
> > a global area (you can
> > > consider it
> > > as a global package). Potentially
> > you can promote an asset
> > > that you
> > > think is more appropriate to be
> > defined in a global scope from
> > > your
> > > current package to the global area,
> > so that this global asset
> > > can be
> > > reused by every package. This
> > feature is already on trunk,
> > > maybe you
> > > want to give it a try. Any comments
> > or feedbacks will be highly
> > > appreciated.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jervis
> > >
> > >
> > > Amit Kumar wrote:
> > > > Hello All,
> > > >
> > > > I am looking to organize the rules
> > in different categories.
> > > But for
> > > > distribution purposes We are
> > creating packages for different
> > > > roles/processing phases
> > > >
> > > > So a rule will reside in one
> > pckage but for navigation it
> > > can belong
> > > > to multiple categories
> > > >
> > > > So packages are like Shirts,
> > Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> > > > Categories are Color, Material,
> > Size, Gender and those have sub
> > > > categories witin them
> > > >
> > > > We have rules which will device
> > the category of the item
> > > > Like "red rule", "blue rule",
> > "cloth rule", leather rule"
> > > >
> > > > Now the problem we are facing is
> > for category rules is if I
> > > define the
> > > > rule in Shirt package .. then I
> > will not be able ot use it
> > > in Pant
> > > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
> > > >
> > > > The other problem in this scenario
> > is If I have a price rule
> > > in Shirt
> > > > package and the category is "Blue
> > Color" and "XL Size" then
> > > I will
> > > > have to put it in both categories
> > > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on
> > "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
> > > on "XL
> > > > Category" and I put the rule in
> > both categories.. will it
> > > be an "and"
> > > > relationship or will be an "OR"
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Amit
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > rules-users mailing list
> > > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
> > > >
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > rules-users mailing list
> > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
> > >
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rules-users mailing list
> > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > >
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > Esteban Aliverti
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > Esteban Aliverti
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100317/6ce52da8/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list