[rules-users] Rules categorization/packages

Amit Kumar amitkumar at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 11:20:02 EDT 2010


https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR-514
Model is also there

:)

2010/3/17 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>

> It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a part
> of it).
>
> Best,
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR
>>
>> We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.
>>
>> Toni
>>
>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>> > Sorry for spamming today
>> > It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All
>> > of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is
>> > there..
>> > But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it
>> > permits me to assign a variable to it
>> > like Equipment(eId : entityId)
>> > but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability
>> > in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
>> > Thanks,
>> > Amit
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
>> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Ok I tried again.  :(
>> >
>> >     In Equipment I only see manufacturer
>> >     In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
>> >     In Software I do not see anything.
>> >
>> >     It contains many more classes
>> >
>> >     Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
>> >     model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
>> >     it on alias
>> >
>> >     Thanks
>> >     Amit
>> >
>> >
>> >     2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
>> >     <mailto:esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>>
>> >
>> >         But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
>> >
>> >         2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
>> >         <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>>
>> >
>> >             Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
>> >             and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
>> >             issue sometime back with 5.0
>> >             Thanks
>> >             Amit
>> >
>> >             On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
>> >             <amitkumar at gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >                 Its coming from a JAR
>> >                 Thanks
>> >                 Amit
>> >
>> >                 Equipment
>> >                       entityId        int
>> >                       partNumber      String
>> >                       manufacturer    String
>> >                       owningEntityId  int
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                 Software
>> >                       entityId        int
>> >                       OSType  String
>> >                       OSVersion       String
>> >                       imageName       String
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                 EquipmentCA extends Equipment
>> >                       hostname        String
>> >                       productName     String
>> >                       productFamily   String
>> >                       productId       String
>> >
>> >                 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
>> >                 <mailto:esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>>
>> >
>> >                     Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
>> >                     a Declarative Model?
>> >
>> >
>> >                     On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
>> >                     <trikkola at redhat.com <mailto:trikkola at redhat.com>>
>> >                     wrote:
>> >
>> >                         Hi,
>> >
>> >                         Its possible that there are some bugs in the
>> >                         snapshots. Can you tell me
>> >                         what your model looks like?
>> >
>> >                         Toni
>> >
>> >                         Amit Kumar wrote:
>> >                         > The latest builds seem to be no good for
>> guvnor
>> >                         > They do seem rich in features .. especially
>> >                         support for
>> >                         > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
>> >                         inbox and global packages.
>> >                         >
>> >                         > But But But.. on adding a fact in the
>> >                         when/then clause then all the
>> >                         > attributes of the facts are not coming ..
>> >                         some attributes come.. not
>> >                         > all of them.
>> >                         > I am picking it from here
>> >                         >
>> >
>> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
>> >                         > Any other place I can look :)
>> >                         >
>> >                         > Thanks
>> >                         > Amit
>> >                         >
>> >                         > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
>> >                         <amitkumar at gmail.com <mailto:
>> amitkumar at gmail.com>
>> >                         > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com
>> >                         <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>> >                         >
>> >                         >     Thanks Jervis!!
>> >                         >
>> >                         >     On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
>> >                         Jervisliu <jliu at redhat.com
>> >                         <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>
>> >                         >     <mailto:jliu at redhat.com
>>  >                         <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>>> wrote:
>> >                         >
>> >                         >         A new feature called "Sharable
>> >                         artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
>> >                         >         available in Drools 5.1. This
>> >                         feature allows you share an
>> >                         >         asset among
>> >                         >         different packages. It also creates
>> >                         a global area (you can
>> >                         >         consider it
>> >                         >         as a global package). Potentially
>> >                         you can promote an asset
>> >                         >         that you
>> >                         >         think is more appropriate to be
>> >                         defined in a global scope from
>> >                         >         your
>> >                         >         current package to the global area,
>> >                         so that this global asset
>> >                         >         can be
>> >                         >         reused by every package. This
>> >                         feature is already on trunk,
>> >                         >         maybe you
>> >                         >         want to give it a try. Any comments
>> >                         or feedbacks will be highly
>> >                         >         appreciated.
>> >                         >
>> >                         >         Cheers,
>> >                         >         Jervis
>> >                         >
>> >                         >
>> >                         >         Amit Kumar wrote:
>> >                         >         > Hello All,
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >         > I am looking to organize the rules
>> >                         in different categories.
>> >                         >         But for
>> >                         >         > distribution purposes We are
>> >                         creating packages for different
>> >                         >         > roles/processing phases
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >         > So a rule will reside in one
>> >                         pckage but for navigation it
>> >                         >         can belong
>> >                         >         > to multiple categories
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >         > So packages are like Shirts,
>> >                         Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>> >                         >         > Categories are Color, Material,
>> >                         Size, Gender and those have sub
>> >                         >         > categories witin them
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >         > We have rules which will device
>> >                         the category of the item
>> >                         >         > Like "red rule", "blue rule",
>> >                         "cloth rule", leather rule"
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >         > Now the problem we are facing is
>> >                         for category rules is if I
>> >                         >         define the
>> >                         >         > rule in Shirt package .. then I
>> >                         will not be able ot use it
>> >                         >         in Pant
>> >                         >         > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >         > The other problem in this scenario
>> >                         is If I have a price rule
>> >                         >         in Shirt
>> >                         >         > package and the category is "Blue
>> >                         Color" and "XL Size" then
>> >                         >         I will
>> >                         >         > have to put it in both categories
>> >                         >         > When I put the "Blue Rule" on
>> >                         "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
>> >                         >         on "XL
>> >                         >         > Category"  and I put the rule in
>> >                         both categories.. will it
>> >                         >         be an "and"
>> >                         >         > relationship or will be an "OR"
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >         > Regards,
>> >                         >         > Amit
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         _______________________________________________
>> >                         >         > rules-users mailing list
>> >                         >         > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >                         <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> >                         <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >                         <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>> >                         >         >
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >                         >         >
>> >                         >
>> >                         >
>> >                         _______________________________________________
>> >                         >         rules-users mailing list
>> >                         >         rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >                         <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> >                         <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >                         <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>> >                         >
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >                         >
>> >                         >
>> >                         >
>> >                         >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >                         >
>> >                         >
>> _______________________________________________
>> >                         > rules-users mailing list
>> >                         > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >                         <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> >                         >
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >                         >
>> >
>> >                         _______________________________________________
>> >                         rules-users mailing list
>> >                         rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >                         <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                     --
>> >                     XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>> >
>> >                     Esteban Aliverti
>> >
>> >                     _______________________________________________
>> >                     rules-users mailing list
>> >                     rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >                     <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >             _______________________________________________
>> >             rules-users mailing list
>> >             rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >             <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> >             https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >         --
>> >         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>> >
>> >         Esteban Aliverti
>> >
>> >         _______________________________________________
>> >         rules-users mailing list
>>  >         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> >         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100317/de27ed97/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list