[rules-users] Rules categorization/packages
Esteban Aliverti
esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
Thu Mar 18 09:07:56 EDT 2010
I added a comment to your jira entry. Please take a look.
2010/3/17 Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com>
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR-514
> Model is also there
>
> :)
>
> 2010/3/17 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>
>
> It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a part
>> of it).
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola at redhat.com>wrote:
>>
>>> You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR
>>>
>>> We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.
>>>
>>> Toni
>>>
>>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>>> > Sorry for spamming today
>>> > It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All
>>> > of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is
>>> > there..
>>> > But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it
>>> > permits me to assign a variable to it
>>> > like Equipment(eId : entityId)
>>> > but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability
>>> > in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Amit
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Ok I tried again. :(
>>> >
>>> > In Equipment I only see manufacturer
>>> > In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
>>> > In Software I do not see anything.
>>> >
>>> > It contains many more classes
>>> >
>>> > Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
>>> > model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
>>> > it on alias
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Amit
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>>
>>> >
>>> > But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
>>> >
>>> > 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar at gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>>
>>> >
>>> > Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
>>> > and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
>>> > issue sometime back with 5.0
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Amit
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
>>> > <amitkumar at gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Its coming from a JAR
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Amit
>>> >
>>> > Equipment
>>> > entityId int
>>> > partNumber String
>>> > manufacturer String
>>> > owningEntityId int
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Software
>>> > entityId int
>>> > OSType String
>>> > OSVersion String
>>> > imageName String
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > EquipmentCA extends Equipment
>>> > hostname String
>>> > productName String
>>> > productFamily String
>>> > productId String
>>> >
>>> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>>
>>> >
>>> > Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
>>> > a Declarative Model?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
>>> > <trikkola at redhat.com <mailto:trikkola at redhat.com>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Its possible that there are some bugs in the
>>> > snapshots. Can you tell me
>>> > what your model looks like?
>>> >
>>> > Toni
>>> >
>>> > Amit Kumar wrote:
>>> > > The latest builds seem to be no good for
>>> guvnor
>>> > > They do seem rich in features .. especially
>>> > support for
>>> > > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
>>> > inbox and global packages.
>>> > >
>>> > > But But But.. on adding a fact in the
>>> > when/then clause then all the
>>> > > attributes of the facts are not coming ..
>>> > some attributes come.. not
>>> > > all of them.
>>> > > I am picking it from here
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
>>> > > Any other place I can look :)
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > Amit
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
>>> > <amitkumar at gmail.com <mailto:
>>> amitkumar at gmail.com>
>>> > > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:amitkumar at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks Jervis!!
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
>>> > Jervisliu <jliu at redhat.com
>>> > <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>
>>> > > <mailto:jliu at redhat.com
>>> > <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > A new feature called "Sharable
>>> > artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
>>> > > available in Drools 5.1. This
>>> > feature allows you share an
>>> > > asset among
>>> > > different packages. It also creates
>>> > a global area (you can
>>> > > consider it
>>> > > as a global package). Potentially
>>> > you can promote an asset
>>> > > that you
>>> > > think is more appropriate to be
>>> > defined in a global scope from
>>> > > your
>>> > > current package to the global area,
>>> > so that this global asset
>>> > > can be
>>> > > reused by every package. This
>>> > feature is already on trunk,
>>> > > maybe you
>>> > > want to give it a try. Any comments
>>> > or feedbacks will be highly
>>> > > appreciated.
>>> > >
>>> > > Cheers,
>>> > > Jervis
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Amit Kumar wrote:
>>> > > > Hello All,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I am looking to organize the rules
>>> > in different categories.
>>> > > But for
>>> > > > distribution purposes We are
>>> > creating packages for different
>>> > > > roles/processing phases
>>> > > >
>>> > > > So a rule will reside in one
>>> > pckage but for navigation it
>>> > > can belong
>>> > > > to multiple categories
>>> > > >
>>> > > > So packages are like Shirts,
>>> > Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>>> > > > Categories are Color, Material,
>>> > Size, Gender and those have sub
>>> > > > categories witin them
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We have rules which will device
>>> > the category of the item
>>> > > > Like "red rule", "blue rule",
>>> > "cloth rule", leather rule"
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Now the problem we are facing is
>>> > for category rules is if I
>>> > > define the
>>> > > > rule in Shirt package .. then I
>>> > will not be able ot use it
>>> > > in Pant
>>> > > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The other problem in this scenario
>>> > is If I have a price rule
>>> > > in Shirt
>>> > > > package and the category is "Blue
>>> > Color" and "XL Size" then
>>> > > I will
>>> > > > have to put it in both categories
>>> > > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on
>>> > "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
>>> > > on "XL
>>> > > > Category" and I put the rule in
>>> > both categories.. will it
>>> > > be an "and"
>>> > > > relationship or will be an "OR"
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > > Amit
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > > > rules-users mailing list
>>> > > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > > rules-users mailing list
>>> > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > > rules-users mailing list
>>> > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>> >
>>> > Esteban Aliverti
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>> >
>>> > Esteban Aliverti
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>
>> Esteban Aliverti
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100318/8dba0bb3/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list