[rules-users] same criteria across multiple rules cancels activation with Property Reactive Facts

[Mark Proctor]

On 14 Dec 2012, at 14:10, m11 <mchanian at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi , 
> 
> I re ran the test using drools 5.4.0 too, same problem.  In the majority of
> our cases Property Reactive Facts work really well. Not using this feature
> is not really an option that we would like to take as we would have to
> rewrite the rules. We have thousands of rules. 
> 
> Can you please let me know the process for getting this bug fixed in drools?  
Contact Red Hat for support subscription information, which will give you a direct line to RHT product management, for bug escalation. sales at jboss.com
http://blog.athico.com/2011/04/drools-jbpm-community-versus-product.html

I also wrote a page on how to submit unit tests and bug fixes:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html

Mark
> 
> I would like to propagate this issue to the engineering team and for them to
> fix the bug in the next release. 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/same-criteria-across-multiple-rules-cancels-activation-with-Property-Reactive-Facts-tp4021204p4021208.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users