[rules-users] FireAllRules for all agenda

[Wolfgang Laun]

Not so long ago there was talk about some highly innovative development
that would permit you to write rules to control the agenda logic, something
to supersede the bestiary of features that came into being over the years.

I'm not quite sure about the status of this feature -probably still is
experimental and unstable.

-W


On 20/01/2012, FrankVhh <frank.vanhoenshoven at agserv.eu> wrote:
> This is interesting...
>
> Is there
>   A) Any reason why it is not possible to put rules into multiple agenda
> groups? After all, it should be a filter, not a package.
>   B) Any plans on making this feasible in future releases?
>
> ftr, The same questions can be asked about ruleflow-groups.
>
> Until now, I actually always assumed that it was possible to put rules into
> multiple groups. Apparently, this was something that I never really tried.
> It is a bit sad to start the weekend being disappointed.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Frank
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/FireAllRules-for-all-agenda-tp3674638p3675641.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>