[rules-users] Expert Systems and Functional programming?

[Wolfgang Laun]

Indeed, this thesis mentions a few features of the system I was
talking about :-)
([13])
-W

On 11/03/2013, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
> There were a number of research efforts that looked at combining procedural
> and rule base programming.
> This one is quite interesting:
> Combining Rule-Based and Procedural Programming in the XC and XE Programming
> Lanaugages
> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.9.1106&rep=rep1&type=pdf
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 11 Mar 2013, at 18:03, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11 March 2013 16:19, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>> So thinking really long term here. Can we build a "java layer" that
>> provide all the rule functionality we need - but fit ontop of the java
>> language neatly. We'd probably need to allow "rule" keyword and have it in
>> Classes, at the method level. All class members and methods would be
>> available to the rules in that class.
>>
>> There is this production rule system where you can write your rules
>> embedded in compiling units, and alongside the legacy program units, of a
>> procedural, modular, strongly type HLL, and where you use expressions in
>> the language's own syntax in constraints...
>>
>> We've been using it ever since 1986. Rabbi Akiva was right, wasn't he ;-)
>>
>> -W
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>