[teiid-designer-dev] Teiid In JCA Container

[John Doyle]

I like the vision.  I'll need to read all this again and think it through, but I do have a couple of immediate questions and thoughts. 

Has there been any discussion concerning how these changes effect the attractiveness embedded of Teiid?  I'm concerned that it will be less attractive in OEM opportunities, and not necessarily in any specific technical sense, but that it's more 'heavyweight' because it requires a container.  

I know you mentioned JBJCA for future embedded deployments, can that replace all the services of the container or our current implementations, or would there be some loss of functionality?

I need to read up on JCA, but there are some unique connection management concerns with the SalesForce connector (close one and they all close) that might have to be resolved.

Thanks for writing this up, this is just the kind of detail I need to see to really understand the future vision of Teiid and see the implications.

~jd


----- "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy at redhat.com> wrote:

> Following through the 6.3
> features(http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/teiid-dev/2009-September/000218.html),
> I have taken time to write a simple proof of concept prototype of JCA
> based Teiid use case using JBoss Embedded container. The results have
> been very positive.
> 
> I have put together my brain dump on this subject as
> requirements/design
> document. Please take time to read, as this proposes a shift in Teiid
> architecture that affects all areas of Teiid.
> 
> http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/TeiidInJCAContainer
> 
> If you would like keep up with progress of this project watch
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/TEIID-833
> 
> Please let me know if you have any suggestions and comments to make
> this
> even better.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Ramesh..
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> teiid-designer-dev mailing list
> teiid-designer-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-designer-dev