Hi Emily,
I cannot find anything in the CDI spec that would prevent lazy
initialization of the web container. Therefore, I think you are right
and the test should be modified. There is already a CDI TCK ticket at
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-484
Jozef
On 05/24/2015 04:21 PM, Emily Jiang wrote:
I am trying to run the cdi tck:
org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.application.event.ApplicationScopeEventMultiWarTest
Method: testDeployment
It seems this test is to verify whether both web modules receive the
initilization event of ApplicationScoped. The confusing bit is that
the test directly verfies whether both events are received without
trying to send request to activate the web modules. I think the test
assume web modules are active and did not consider the fact of that
some application server starts the modules in a lazy mode.
The CDI spec says:
The application scope is active:
• during the service() method of any servlet in the web application,
during the doFilter()
method of any servlet filter and when the container calls any
ServletContextListener,
HttpSessionListener, AsyncListener or ServletRequestListener
According to cdi spec 6.7.3:
An event with qualifier @Initialized(ApplicationScoped.class) is fired
when the application
context is initialized and an event with qualifier
@Destroyed(ApplicationScoped.class) is fired
when the application is destroyed. The event payload is:
• the ServletContext if the application is a web application deployed
to a Servlet container, or
• any java.lang.Object for other types of application.
The spec did not say whether the event should be recieved. In my
environment, if the web module url is hit, the obeserved event will be
obsevered.
I think we have implemented this correctly as I can confirm the
application scope is active when a request is sent and the event of
@Initialized(ApplicationScoped.class) is received as well but the test
assumes the web module is active automatically without even needing to
send the first request.
Can someone shed some lights on this? What is the test trying to do? I
am suggesting the test should be updated to send the first request
first before checking the size of the obsevers.
I did not directly send to cdi tck as I would like to get some input
from weld dev list first.
--
Thanks
Emily
=================
Emily Jiang
ejiang(a)apache.org <mailto:ejiang@apache.org>
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev