[esb-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Assigned: (JBESB-2097) ServiceInvoker Exception details

ServiceInvoker Exception details -------------------------------- Key: JBESB-2097 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBESB-2097 Project: JBoss ESB Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) Components: Rosetta Affects Versions: 4.4 Reporter: Burr Sutter Assignee: Mark Little Current the ServiceInvoker.deliverSync() method might throw the following exceptions: MessageDeliverException RegistryException FaultMessageException requestMessage = MessageFactory.getInstance().getMessage(); requestMessage.getProperties().setProperty(Environment.EXCEPTION_ON_DELIVERY_FAILURE,"true"); ServiceInvoker invoker = new ServiceInvoker("MyCategory", "Service99"); replyMessage = invoker.deliverSync(requestMessage,2000); A service name which does not exist results in a MessageDeliverException, with the following information exposed via a System.err.println(mde); 11:25:16,179 ERROR [STDERR] org.jboss.soa.esb.listeners.message.MessageDeliverEx ception: Failed to deliver message [header: [ ]] to Service [MyCategory:Servic e99]. Check for errors. It would have made more sense for it to be a RegistryException and the actual message doesn't indicate that there is a lookup problem. Futhermore, a timeout results in the following MessageDeliverException: 11:45:06,278 ERROR [STDERR] org.jboss.soa.esb.listeners.message.MessageDeliverEx ception: Failed to deliver message [header: [ To: InVMEpr [ PortReference < <wsa :Address invm://52455354456173794553425365727669636531/false?false#10000/>, <wsa :ReferenceProperties jbossesb:passByValue : false/>, <wsa:ReferenceProperties jb ossesb:type : urn:jboss/esb/epr/type/invm/> > ] ReplyTo: InVMEpr [ PortReference < <wsa:Address invm://thread-559/>, <wsa:ReferenceProperties jbossesb:passByVal ue : false/>, <wsa:ReferenceProperties jbossesb:type : urn:jboss/esb/epr/type/in vm/> > ] ]] to Service [MyCategory:Service1]. Told not to retry. No indication that the problem is timeout and the "Told not to retry" is a bit terse.