[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-941?page=comments#action_12374556 ]
Mark Little commented on JBESB-941:
-----------------------------------
Yes, the EPR was always meant to be hidden. Will make this clearer in the documentation.
From a sender perspective we have service names, but they're not available at the
receiver, i.e., once you've got an input message all you have are the EPRs and no way
to map back. This is a discussion TomF and I have had and there's a related JIRA (to
be linked to this one now).
Make it clear EPRs are a low-level mechanism
--------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-941
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-941
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 4.2 Milestone Release 3
Reporter: Mark Little
Assigned To: Mark Little
Fix For: 4.2.1
Intern:
"I am assuming that EPRs are the low-level physical endpoint identifier mentioned in
the ESB presentations and the service name is the corresponding logical name? If
that's the case then presumably there's a level of abstraction missing from the
Message, since it appears that applications still work in terms of EPRs and service names.
Shouldn't the EPRs be hidden?"
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira