GateIn objects
by Julien Viet
I have created the XML schema for GateIn objects that are deployed
from the configuration the initial time a portal is started.
The target namespace is http://www.gatein.org/xml/ns/gatein_objects_1_0.xsd
and it should not evolve as "1.0" release which means that it
describe what we support from the project perspective for the life
time of GateIn 3.x. Later we may need to update the model and if we do
so, it should be in a compatible manner between revisions. As for the http://www.gatein.org/xml/ns/gatein_resources_1_0.xsd
, we have deliberately chosen to use the 1.0 versioning to show that
we decouple the evolution of the file from the evolution of the gatein
project. You can consider those format as what I call XPI for eXternal
Public Interface, i.e what we provide in a public manner that allow
users to use the project in a "safe" manner.
The XSD is available in gatein jars (in component.portal) and it
should be also hosted on its public URI sometime although it is not
necessary for the runtime. It can still also be reviewed by anyone
before the gatein 3.0 release in order to fix bugs in the XSD or
suggest a better structure of the schema.
cheers
Julien
15 years, 7 months
Configuration of default portal in GateIn CR1
by Michal Vančo
Hi,
I'm trying to configure default portal in GateIn CR1, but this
configuration isn't passed to the application.
I set it in this file:
../server/default/deploy/gatein.ear/02portal.war/WEB-INF/conf/portal/portal-configuration.xml
in this property:
<value-param>
<name>default.portal</name>
<description>The default portal for checking db is empty or not</description>
<value>testPortal</value>
</value-param>
Is it a bug or is this configuration changed?
I tried it on Gate beta4 and version 2 weeks old and there it works fine.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
--
Michal Vančo
Quality Assurance Associate, JBoos QE
Tel.: +420 532 294 186
Cell.: +420 723 087 016
Email: mvanco(a)redhat.com
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
15 years, 7 months
exo kernel and depending on an external-plugin-configuration
by Matthew Wringe
In WSRP we need to depend on an external-plugin-configuration to setup
the 'repository' repo in jcr. WSRP is configured using the
ExoKernelIntergration.
Is there anyway to make the wcrp configuration happen after the
external-plugin-configuration has occured?
The issue only occurs when using the IBM jdk and not the Sun one.
15 years, 7 months
Gatein Selenium (JBQA-3004, GTNPORTAL-509)
by Prabhat Jha
Hi Dimitri,
Regarding adding new tests, what are your thoughts on recording using Selenium IDE and then converting to java? I simply start from java way as you know. But if your approach has worked well and you think it's efficient, may be that's what we should do for GateIn.
Thanks,
Prabhat
----- Original Message -----
From: "Prabhat Jha" <pjha(a)redhat.com>
To: "Thomas Heute" <theute(a)redhat.com>
Cc: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:15:09 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] Gatein Selenium tests comment (JBQA-3004, GTNPORTAL-509)
Yes, you can run them outside of Hudson. :-) Michal will send instructions on how to run tests.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Heute" <theute(a)redhat.com>
To: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:50:53 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [gatein-dev] Gatein Selenium tests comment (JBQA-3004, GTNPORTAL-509)
Good news :)
We will need instructions to run those (Can we run them outside of
Hudson ?), and also how to add tests.
Thanks !
On 02/23/2010 10:31 AM, Michal Vančo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I tested described version of tests and get the following results:
> - localhost:
> - Tomcat: Tests run: 21, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> - JBoss AS: Tests run: 21, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> - Hudson:
> - Tomcat: Tests run: 21, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> (more details at: http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/GateIn/job/gatein_portal_ui_selenium_... )
> - JBoss: Tests run: 21, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> (more details at: http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/GateIn/job/gatein_portal_ui_selenium_... )
>
> I used the following variables to run the tests:
> - selenium.port=6666
> - selenium.timeout=60000
> - selenium.speed=250
>
> These tests I run on yesterday trunk version of GateIn and default DB -
> HSQLDB. I'll also try to run these tests on other DBs.
>
> Good job, it is first time to see the "Success" status of UI job in
> Hudson.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michal
>
> Dimitri BAELI wrote at Tue 23. 02. 2010 v 00:55 +0100:
>
>> Hello,
>> Today I've worked with Michal to have the same results on both sides for the Selenium tests.
>> Michal will run the tests again tomorrow and will give his feedback.
>>
>> A new organisation is taking place for the Selenium Tests:
>>
>> Inside the testsuite/selenium-snifftests/ module not all the tests are run by default, only those who should not fail.
>>
>> /selenium (21)
>> /selenium/candidate/ (2) : The tests ready to be integrated in the suite, but should be verified on both sides.
>> /selenium/design/ (0) : New test being designed
>> /selenium/issue/ (5) : Tests failing due to a GateIn known issue (with Jira Issue)
>> /selenium/ko (6) : Tests broken or not ready for full automation, under study to determine if it is a GateIn issue or unstable test to be fixed
>> /selenium/unstable/ (1) : Tests ok in SeleniumIDE but not always passing at full speed.
>>
>> So current status is 21 (+2) tests ok, 5 blocked by a GateIn issue, 6 under study.
>> To be confirmed by Michal, for sure.
>>
>> Next step is to let the Portal Team (with part of the eXo QA Team) finalize and extend those tests.
>>
>> Dimitri
>>
>> On 18 févr. 2010, at 16:56, Prabhat Jha wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Dimitri,
>>>
>>> Any update on this? I was hoping to have these taken care of this week so that we can focus on new tests starting next week.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Prabhat
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dimitri"<dbaeli(a)gmail.com>
>>> To: "Michal Vančo"<mvanco(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org, "Prabhat Jha"<pjha(a)redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 9:50:53 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>>> Subject: Re: Gatein Selenium tests comment (JBQA-3004, GTNPORTAL-509)
>>>
>>> Tests order is not controled, I'll have a look on that.
>>> A test failure should not affect the others (browser is restarted and
>>> session also), this is annoying, a better tearDown of the tests will
>>> be studied.
>>>
>>> Dimitri BAELI
>>> VP Quality -- eXo Platform
>>>
>>> Le 15 févr. 2010 à 16:41, Michal Vančo<mvanco(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've tried the Selenium tests on trunk version of GateIn and almost
>>>> all
>>>> the tests are failing due to the unreachable actions -> timeout.
>>>> There are links to hudson:
>>>> http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/GateIn/job/gatein_portal_ui_selenium_...
>>>> http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/GateIn/job/gatein_portal_ui_selenium_...
>>>>
>>>> Seems like the tests are failing, because in some test case, there was
>>>> set a french language to signed user, than the test fails and french
>>>> language remains. Then the other tests can't find the elements
>>>> present,
>>>> because they are in other language.
>>>>
>>>> I have also checked the tests on localhost on beta5 (tomcat) and
>>>> have a
>>>> same problem, but only at last 14 tests. Reports from this testing are
>>>> attached.
>>>>
>>>> I would prefer to place the tests which are changing languages (of
>>>> signed user) to the end, because if some of them fails, all the
>>>> following tests fails as well.
>>>>
>>>> Also, please run the tests on trunk version of GateIn to be able to
>>>> compare results.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>
>>>> Michal Vanco
>>>>
>>>> And btw. thanks Dimitri for configuration on JBoss AS (selenium port),
>>>> now we can run the tests much easier.
>>>>
>>>> Dimitri BAELI wrote at 12. 02. 2010 v 18:21 +0700:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> Today a new version of the Selenium Tests have been commited with
>>>>> some tooling to generate them from the html version (easier to record
>>>>> and maintain for such basic scripts).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They are now located in testsuite/selenium-snifftests
>>>>> To perform the tests mvn install -Pselenium
>>>>> The JUnit classes are generated in target/generated/test from the
>>>>> src/suite content.
>>>>> Those tests have been tested on the GateIn beta5 and should ensure
>>>>> there is no major regression on the UI part.
>>>>> 3 tests are currently failing due to GTNPORTAL known issues, some
>>>>> instability (when running Selenium full speed) are under study.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll soon provide a documentation on how to record some new
>>>>> scripts (using Selenium IDE) and integrate then in the testsuite, the
>>>>> Portal Tester will be in charge for that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Warning for Selenium on Snowleopard, FF crashes, and for the moment
>>>>> the fix is to patch and recompile selenium-rc and the
>>>>> selenium-maven-plugin (documented in the readme
>>>>> of testsuite/selenium-snifftests).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dimitri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 21 janv. 2010 à 20:50, Dimitri BAELI a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Début du message réexpédié :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> De : Michal Vančo<mvanco(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Date : 20 janvier 2010 17:44:47 HNEC
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> À : gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cc : dbaeli(a)gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Objet : Gatein Selenium tests comment (JBQA-3004, GTNPORTAL-509)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I work on running ui tests for gatein from exo
>>>>>>> (https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBQA-3004 ).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I send some comments about selenium tests that I run on localhost
>>>>>>> (I
>>>>>>> used the list of cases from
>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GTNPORTAL-509 ).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Selenium tests comments (tested on beta04 with Tomcat):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_01 WC3 check for pages in public - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_02 Create new account - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_03 Change displaying language - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_04 Sign in/out - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_05 Remember my login - FAIL - remember me funcion
>>>>>>> doesn't work
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_06 Users Management - FAIL - changes in profile editting
>>>>>>> (mary) didn't reproduce to User Management page, but after Edit
>>>>>>> again -
>>>>>>> edited values are displayed
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_07 Groups Management - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_08 Memberships Management - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_09 Import application - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_10 Create/Edit/Delete category - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_11 Add application into category - FAIL - trying to set
>>>>>>> permission on application which is not selected, I think that the
>>>>>>> application should be add into "category test edit"
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_12 Portlet - ISN'T PRESENT
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_13 Add gadget(remote/create new) - FAIL - not correctly
>>>>>>> started (Sign in->Dashboard...)
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_14 Show or not Import Application icon - ISN'T PRESENT
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_15 Link to pages - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_16 Expand All - ISN'T PRESENT
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_17 Collapse All - ISN'T PRESENT
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_18 Create new portal - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_19 Edit portal - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_20 Delete portal - FAIL -
>>>>>>> waitForElementPresent //div[@class='CollapseIcon'], before this
>>>>>>> there is
>>>>>>> twice clickAt "Platform", I think that there should be clickAt
>>>>>>> "Platform" and then clickAt "Administrators" (or
>>>>>>> waitForElementPresent
>>>>>>> "Platform", clickAt "Platform"), then there twice clickAt Save
>>>>>>> (should
>>>>>>> be waitForElementPresent "Save", clickAt "Save"))
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_21 Change using portal -OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_22 Create/Edit page/Edit site layout for portal - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_23 Add Navigation - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_24 Edit navigation/Edit properties/Delete/ in Group
>>>>>>> Navigation
>>>>>>> - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_25 Edit page of node - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_26 Move up/down a node - ISN'T PRESENT
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_27 Create/Edit page/Edit site layout for group - (1,2)
>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_28 Add/drag-drop - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_29 Add/Edit?Delete tab - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_30 Create/Edit page/Edit site layout for user - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_31 Change language - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_32 Change skin - OK
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_33 Setting account - OK (but has a wrong name -
>>>>>>> LogoPortletAccSetting and code SNF_PRL_34)
>>>>>>> * SNF_PRL_34 Change logo - INS'T PRESENT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is also SNF_PRL_35 under which the advanced page
>>>>>>> adding/editing -
>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can also reproduce the result file from test cases if needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for for your replies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Michal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dimitri BAELI
>>>>>> VP Quality - eXo Platform
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Dimitri BAELI
>>>>> VP Quality - eXo Platform
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> <report>
>>>> <surefire-reports.zip>
>>>>
>> Dimitri BAELI
>> VP Quality - eXo Platform
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
15 years, 7 months
Node type generation
by Julien Viet
I have updated Chromattic in trunk and for now it generates the
nodetypes.xml from the processed model and outputs it on the standard
out.
You will see something like :
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 5 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 10 source files to /Users/julien/java/gatein/portal/
trunk/gadgets/core/target/classes
Generated node types (still beta) <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<nodeTypes>
<nodeType name="lgn:gadgettoken" isMixin="false"
hasOrderableChildNodes="false">
<supertypes>
<supertype>mix:referenceable</supertype>
</supertypes>
<propertyDefinitions>
<propertyDefinition name="tokenName" propertyType="String"
autoCreated="false" mandatory="false" onParentVersion="COPY"
protected="false" multiple="false">
<valueConstraints/>
</propertyDefinition>
<propertyDefinition name="moduleId" propertyType="Long"
autoCreated="false" mandatory="false" onParentVersion="COPY"
protected="false" multiple="false">
<valueConstraints/>
</propertyDefinition>
<propertyDefinition name="accessToken" propertyType="String"
autoCreated="false" mandatory="false" onParentVersion="COPY"
protected="false" multiple="false">
<valueConstraints/>
It is not used (as it's not finished) but may seem strange if you are
not aware off that.
So don't bother much :-)
15 years, 7 months
Thirdparty and component update
by Julien Viet
Hi All,
I have commited the integration of the following thirdparty and
components:
- JCR 1.12.0-CR1
- MOP 1.0.0-Beta16
- Chromattic 1.0.0-beta17
The JCR integration allows a simpler configuration by removing many
XML configuration files that were introduced in Beta06. As usual the
integration is described here http://community.jboss.org/wiki/GateInJCRintegration
, the main issue related to the cache loader database table will be
resolved in the next JCR version that should be released by the end of
this week.
As mentioned earlier, a CR2 release of JCR will be done by end of this
week that will be integrated for the GateIn CR1 release.
cheers
Julien
15 years, 7 months
Release of Gatein Portal
by Arnaud Héritier
Hi,
Thomas, how are you releasing GateIn projects ? Are you using the release
plugin ? I don't remember.
I found 2 issues this morning while releasing the CP of portal :
- In our builds we are sharing some tests artifacts, but the release
process was configured to not generate test classes/artifacts
(-Dmaven.test.skip=true) instead of just asking to not launch them
(-DskipTests)
http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/gatein/?cs=1533
- There is a known issue in maven's core and the release plugin which
often requires to install binaries on the prepare phase (in theory we
shouldn't). This will be fixed (with workaround) in the version 2.0 of the
release plugin, but in the meantime we have to configure the release plugin
to deploy binaries, otherwise it fails about missing dependencies
http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/gatein/?cs=1532
I think we should open issues about that and fix them in gatein parent.
WDYT ?
Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
---
http://www.aheritier.net
15 years, 7 months
