Intellij license
by Julien Viet
It should expire next week.
I asked for a one year renewal.
I'll keep you informed.
Julien
13 years
Re: [gatein-dev] Performance degradation between JCR 1.14 and 1.15?
by Matt Wringe
On 24/10/12 03:33 PM, Nicolas Filotto wrote:
> Could you please retry with this jar?
I tested it quickly with the updated jar, and it seems to be much closer
to the 1.14 results in my test when dealing with 500 pages. I will let
Nick comment if it fixes the issues he was seeing with import/export of
sites.
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Nick Scavelli <nscavell(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:nscavell@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Here are results of some quick tests I ran on Friday using
> PostgreSQL. Note this is total time spent saving session after 500
> pages, not time spent indexing.
>
> 1.15: 112.916s, 113.433s, 110.835s
>
> 1.14: 69.711s, 81.118s, 81.680s
>
> For 400 pages (only ran this test once)
> 1.15: 61.503s
> 1.14: 57.856s
>
> And the less pages the more closely 1.15 seems to perform close to
> 1.14. This is a very low sample size, and my tests might not best
> paint an accurate picture, but it does seem that 1.14 consistently
> out performs 1.15. So take it as you will. I'm also curious what
> performance is like if I would save the session after every page,
> instead of one large commit of 500 pages.
>
> - Nick
>
13 years, 11 months
Performance degradation between JCR 1.14 and 1.15?
by Matt Wringe
I am looking into some performance issues, and I am seeing some
performance degradation when calling DataStorage.save() between JCR 1.14
and 1.15.
I created a simple test which loads a number of pages using the page
service and then does a datastorage.save at the end
(https://github.com/mwringe/gatein-portal/blob/b331e1868a75bbeb449c8ce589f...).
Note: the only difference I am doing between the tests is changing the
jcr version and adding a lucene dependency for the older 1.14, all the
configuration files and such are the same.
When using JCR 1.15 versus 1.14, I am seeing about a 30% difference
below 300 pages, and then it takes over twice as long when dealing with
400+ pages. Link to spreadsheet data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjYJ_xXGrZ-OdE12RGd5elMzTEpu...
Is DataStorage.save expected to be slower with JCR 1.15 (a trade-off for
some performance gain somewhere else) or is there something which needs
to be done differently when using datastorage and jcr 1.15? or maybe my
test is completely wrong :)
Thanks,
Matt Wringe
13 years, 11 months
Should examples/portal build be mavenized?
by Peter Palaga
Hi *,
I have finally found out why the hell the ported [1] Sample Portal did
not work.
The clue was that the sample portal built within the standard GateIn
build process is only as-if built by maven. The deployable directory is
in fact built by an ad-hoc Ant script and in various ways combined with
resources outside examples/portal.
I could make the quickstart Sample Portal build pure maven, see [2].
Should I do the same for the gatein tree and it's build?
[1] Porting to quickstarts means making the build independent from the
GateIn tree, happening under [2]
[2] https://github.com/gatein/gatein-portal-quickstart
Best,
Peter
13 years, 11 months
3.5.0.Beta1 release sync
by Boleslaw Dawidowicz
Hi,
GateIn 3.5.0.Beta1 is planned for the end of this week. Ideally I would like to create a tag tomorrow afternoon (CET).
Beyond this point we will enter feature code freeze and nothing besides necessary bug fixes should be pushed into git. To avoid mistakes and to not block master I will create 3.5 branch on github on Friday.
If you have any pending commits that you believe should reach 3.5.0.Beta1 please let me know ASAP.
Thanks
Bolek
13 years, 12 months
Testsuite "polluted" by ERROR messages
by Thomas Heute
Would anyone know why we suddenly got such ERROR in the logs when
running the testsuite ? (The testsuite passes fine)
11:22:26,955 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io drop constraint FK94860092CF26285
11:22:26,956 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO
11:22:26,956 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io drop constraint FK948600921900168B
11:22:26,957 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO
11:22:26,957 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_attr drop constraint FK4DC61D7EDE7E39CB
11:22:26,958 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_ATTR
11:22:26,958 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_attr drop constraint FK4DC61D7E992317F0
11:22:26,958 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_ATTR
11:22:26,958 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_attr_text_values drop constraint FKC6F8C733577FACCB
11:22:26,959 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_ATTR_TEXT_VALUES
11:22:26,959 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_creden drop constraint FKF7FB3EC4F1FBD584
11:22:26,959 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_CREDEN
11:22:26,959 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_creden drop constraint FKF7FB3EC4992317F0
11:22:26,960 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_CREDEN
11:22:26,960 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_creden drop constraint FKF7FB3EC429C64409
11:22:26,960 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_CREDEN
11:22:26,960 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_creden_props drop constraint FKBAD648353BD68084
11:22:26,961 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_CREDEN_PROPS
11:22:26,961 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_props drop constraint FK6BCFF78372655F8D
11:22:26,961 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_PROPS
11:22:26,961 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_rel drop constraint FKE9BC4F6C2D9E6CE8
11:22:26,962 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_REL
11:22:26,962 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_rel drop constraint FKE9BC4F6C4EF6CBA4
11:22:26,962 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_REL
11:22:26,962 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_rel drop constraint FKE9BC4F6CE5991E18
11:22:26,963 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_REL
11:22:26,963 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_rel drop constraint FKE9BC4F6C89DEF9C9
11:22:26,963 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_REL
11:22:26,963 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_rel_name drop constraint FK5856A77ECF26285
11:22:26,964 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_REL_NAME
11:22:26,964 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_rel_name_props drop constraint FK224ABD6F3C564090
11:22:26,964 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_REL_NAME_PROPS
11:22:26,964 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_io_rel_props drop constraint FKB2A23ADD93AFB8E5
11:22:26,965 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_IO_REL_PROPS
11:22:26,965 ERROR SchemaExport:425 - HHH000389: Unsuccessful: alter
table jbid_real_props drop constraint FK5F651EFBF40F776D
11:22:26,965 ERROR SchemaExport:426 - user lacks privilege or object not
found: JBID_REAL_PROPS
14 years
GitHub <-> PR
by Thomas Heute
I removed the comment with link to "public" instance. For now the
machine that builds is publicly available, you have the link in "Details"
https://github.com/gatein/gatein-portal/pull/182
The 'public' instance is running out of space too quickly and was making
it non stable. Also at this stage there is no need for it.
The machine is currently running at my place and situation may change
again in a future.
Thomas.
14 years
