I'll let Nicolas give you all the gory details of it :-)
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Julien Viet <julien(a)julienviet.com> wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:06 PM, Patrice Lamarque wrote:
Hello Christophe,
I'll try to share some of my knowledge about the extension mechanism.
Hopefully it will answer some of your questions.
The extension mechanism let's you :
* plug your own kernel config from your own war instead of portal.war
(kernel will load it from yourextension.war/WEB-INF/conf/configuration.xml)
* extend the /portal servlet context so that it can serve resources from
your own war
About the question of JCR workspaces, the extension mechanism is able to
merge all repository-configuration.xml it finds. So to declare your
workspaces, just place them in a repository-configuration.xml inside your
extension war at the exact same location you'll find it in portal.war.
I didnt know about that, is it referenced somewhere ?
HTH.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Christophe Laprun <claprun(a)redhat.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to extract as much WSRP code as possible from GateIn so that
> the WSRP service can be updated without having to update GateIn itself and,
> ideally, be able to package it in a single (ear?) file so that it can easily
> be removed without having configuration files all over the place.
>
> In this process, I'm running into several issues:
>
> 1. The extension mechanism documentation is rather poor at the moment.
> Nowhere is it explained what extensions are good for, what can they be used
> for and, more importantly, what *can't* they used for. For example, it is
> not clear to me whether I could package the WSRP service as an extension
> (though I'm pretty sure I can't).
>
> 2. WSRP-related configuration is, at the moment, spread among several
> files located at different spots making it very difficult to extract so that
> it can be removed (or added to a bare portal install). For example, the main
> configuration file is located in
> web/portal/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/conf/wsrp/wsrp-configuration.xml which is
> linked to by the main configuration.xml file. It would be good if this file
> (and the linked ones) could, at the very least, be moved to the
> component/wsrp module and dynamically picked-up at runtime by the kernel. I
> don't know if this is possible, it might just be a lack of kernel knowledge
> on my part. However, even if extracting these files (and avoiding to have to
> link to them in the main configuration.xml file) was possible, there are
> still other dependencies left to be extracted. In particular, WSRP needs to
> create JCR workspaces and at the moment, these need to be defined in
> repository-configuration.xml. Is it possible to split that file so t!
> hat services can dynamically add new workspaces to the JCR repository as
> needed at runtime? On that note, a lot of that configuration is pretty much
> similar for all the workspaces. Wouldn't it make sense to have reasonable
> default values that users would override only if needed to avoid having long
> and error-prone XML configuration?
>
> 3. The design of the ApplicationRegistryService makes it difficult to
> support WSRP because of the assumption it makes on the format of portlet
> identifiers leading to lots of hardcoded information and if-else cases which
> makes the code brittle and difficult to evolve. Independently of WSRP
> support, it would break if the portlet container was ever to change its
> identifier format. I would like to start a discussion on fixing this issue
> even though I know this is not the priority at the moment.
>
> TL,DR summary: What would be the best way to extract and package the
> WSRP-related code so that it could be added/removed dynamically (while the
> server is stopped at least, though, of course, hot-deploy would be even
> better ^_^)?
>
> Ideas?
>
> Cordialement / Best,
> Chris
>
> ==
> Principal Software Engineer / JBoss Enterprise Middleware Red Hat, Inc.
> Follow GateIn:
http://blog.gatein.org /
http://twitter.com/gatein
> Follow me:
http://metacosm.codepuccino.com /
http://twitter.com/metacosm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
--
*Patrice Lamarque*
VP Platform
eXo Platform SAS
_______________________________________________
gatein-dev mailing list
gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev