12:42 p.m.
I had issues today and could not release PC as the EndPointServlet was trying to validate
the web.xml file when parsing it and causing the build to fail. I suspect that a DTD or
XSD to validate was not available on the official URI (not the first time ORA would do
that).
I commited a patch that inhibits schema validation and made the PC testsuite pass :
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GTNWCI-31
I resolved the issue but could not set the fix version to Beta02 since it does not exist
already.
Could you make a release of Beta02 in order to make the PC release ?
thanks
Julien
On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Matt Wringe wrote:
Ok, I pushed WCI 2.1.1-Beta01 (if there is no objection or issues
brought up with it soon, I would like to release it as 2.1.1).
Info on how to use it here:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/AdvancedWCIRegistrationFeatures
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 09:07 -0500, Matt Wringe wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 14:58 +0100, Julien Viet wrote:
>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Matt Wringe wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 15:22 +0100, Julien Viet wrote:
>>>> I like it, it's simple and easy to use.
>>>>
>>>> a couple of questions:
>>>>
>>>> 1/ are you able to test it ?
>>>
>>> As part of the automated tests, I am able to test that you can disable
>>> the registration of certain web applications, and that you can manually
>>> add the disabled web applications using the GateInServlet.
>>>
>>> I have wasted a lot of time trying to get a test written that will
>>> compare when any normal servlet is started and when the webapplication
>>> gets registered (ie this basically just tests load-on-startup between
>>> the normal servlet and when the gateinservlet does its registration). No
>>> luck here so far.
>>
>> you mean the order ?
>
> yes, the order between when a servlet in the war starts and when the war
> gets registered is not tested. It should be easy to test (static event
> registration class), but there are a bunch of classpath issues which
> makes it difficult with the current test setup.
>
>> well testing the inhibition is already cool.
>>
>>>
>>>> 2/ it would be part of the next minor wci release ?
>>>
>>> If everything is ok, I would like to release a new version of wci as
>>> soon as possible with this feature.
>>
>> ok thanks.
>>
>>>
>>>> On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Matt Wringe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There have been a couple of issues arising from the ordering of
portlets
>>>>> and servlets being out of sync. For example see
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GTNPC-76
>>>>>
>>>>> This isn't really a bug, since the ordering of when portlets and
>>>>> servlets are initialized is not suppose to be guaranteed. But I have
a
>>>>> couple of changes to wci which will allow for this behaviour (see
patch
>>>>> attached to GTNPC-76)
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically there are 2 new features which when used together will
provide
>>>>> ordering between portlets and servlets.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) by using a context-parameter in the web.xml, we can tell the
native
>>>>> wci implementation to not register the specific webapp.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) you can now manually add an application to the wci native
>>>>> implementation.
>>>>>
>>>>> To control ordering:
>>>>> - add in the context-parameter so the native implementation
doesn't
>>>>> register the webapplication (and therefor PC doesn't know about
it)
>>>>> - specify the generic GateInServlet in the web.xml and use the
>>>>> load-on-startup value to control ordering against other servlets.
The
>>>>> GateInServlet will manually register itself to the native
>>>>> implementation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gatein-dev mailing list
>>>>> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gatein-dev mailing list
> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev