Re: [gatein-dev] GateIn and cross context sessions

On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 18:24 +0200, Julien Viet wrote: > it requires indeed empty session path = true to work properly with > tomcat. > > (for the short story empty session path feature was done in tomcat > because of portlet container needs). I created a jira for this https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GTNPORTAL-1118 awaiting gatein version approval before committing these server configuration changes. > On Apr 22, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Matthew Wringe wrote: > >> An issue was brought up lately with cross context sessions not >> working >> properly (https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GTNWCI-15, note that >> its >> not really a wci issue and should probably be moved to the gatein pc >> integration component) >> >> We have a test^1 in the pc (portlet container) component for cross >> context session sharing. For this test to pass we need to make a >> change >> in the JBoss server configuration files^2. But we don't need to make >> any >> changes for Tomcat. >> >> On GateIn its a bit of a different situation. If we make the >> configuration change for JBoss^2, then the example in GTNWCI-15 >> works. >> But it doesn't work for Tomcat. >> >> Looking into gtn a bit more, the session in GateIn is coming from >> the >> server (with context path /portal) and not from the context path of >> the >> portlet. In the pc test the session context path is the same as the >> portlet. >> >> I can get this to work on Tomcat if I make a change to the http >> connector to use emptySessionPath="true"^3. >> >> Do we actually need to make there configuration changes, or I am >> missing >> something and we need to change how the portal and portlet container >> are >> integrated. >> >> Thanks >> >> 1) >> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/gatein/components/pc/trunk/test/src/test/j... >> >> 2)we need to add <SessionCookie path="/"/> in the server >> context.xml, >> this is being done in the pc tests and should have been setup in >> gatein >> at the beginning, but I don't see in gatein anymore. We should add >> this >> option. >> >> 3)http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/http.html as >> mention >> here that its useful for portlet specification implementations, >> but I >> don't know if we actually need it or not. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gatein-dev mailing list >> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev >