Re: [gatein-dev] Initial commit on API implementation
would you mind to move the "Portal" class to "navigation" package
(because that's were it belongs with Site)
and then rename the "navigation" package to "portal" package (because
it contains portal related entities and not only navigation otherwise Site and Page would
not be inside)
thanks
On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Christophe Laprun wrote:
On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Julien Viet wrote:
> does it mean that the object org.object.gatein.Portal has nothing to do with the
portal itself ?
>
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Christophe Laprun wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Julien Viet wrote:
>>
>>> in that fashion it would make sense to move your code package from
org.gatein.api to org.gatein.api.portal package
>>
>> Actually, most of it so far doesn't have much to do with the portal itself…
only navigation does. Using portal in packages is redundant I think.
and Portal, of course! :)
Cordialement / Best,
Chris
==
Principal Software Engineer / JBoss Enterprise Middleware Red Hat, Inc.
Follow GateIn: http://blog.gatein.org / http://twitter.com/gatein
Follow me: http://metacosm.info/metacosm / http://twitter.com/metacosm