can you reproduce this issue with a simpler bridge portlet ?
on my side I can try to give you a patch that fix the issue I did but without doing a
refactor that is inside (moving the computing of the supports map in the getter)
On Oct 2, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Christophe Laprun wrote:
On Oct 2, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Julien Viet wrote:
> could we have Wesley to look at this problem as he seems the most qualified to
understand the problem ?
It's probably going to require collaboration because I don't think the issue is
solely in PBR or GateIn…
> On Oct 1, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Christophe Laprun wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I've spent the last couple of days trying to fix an issue with the WSRP admin
UI which is currently behaving very erratically. After lots of trials and errors I have
finally isolated the issue to commit 4242 in trunk:
http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/gatein/portal/trunk?cs=4242
>>
>> I have no idea why it's causing so many issues but I assume that something in
that commit has broken the Portlet Bridge state management. Julien, Wesley: any ideas?
>>
>> Moving forward, I will make sure that we have some Selenium tests that check the
WSRP admin and the gatein vs gatein WSRP consumption that are run in Hudson as we
certainly could have caught that issue sooner (and avoided losing 2-3 days tracking the
issue).
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Cordialement / Best,
>> Chris
>>
>> ==
>> Principal Software Engineer / JBoss Enterprise Middleware Red Hat, Inc.
>> Follow GateIn:
http://blog.gatein.org /
http://twitter.com/gatein
>> Follow me:
http://metacosm.codepuccino.com /
http://twitter.com/metacosm
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gatein-dev mailing list
>> gatein-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/gatein-dev
>
Cordialement / Best,
Chris
==
Principal Software Engineer / JBoss Enterprise Middleware Red Hat, Inc.
Follow GateIn:
http://blog.gatein.org /
http://twitter.com/gatein
Follow me:
http://metacosm.codepuccino.com /
http://twitter.com/metacosm